YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Toe-Screwed Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Wall Trilinear Pushover Design Modeling

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Dillon Fitzgerald
    ,
    Arijit Sinha
    ,
    Thomas H. Miller
    ,
    John A. Nairn
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002683
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Although toenailing has been common practice in light-frame residential construction, using toe screws in cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls has not been investigated. CLT shear walls with inclined washer-headed, self-tapping screws installed along the wall’s bottom edge into a floor plate were tested to evaluate the shear wall connection. The tested geometry represents platform construction wall-to-floor conditions at the top and bottom of walls in multistory timber buildings. Three CLT shear wall connections—equally spaced toe screws, grouped toe screws, and a combination of toe screws and hold-downs—were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. The full-scale CLT walls had a 2∶1 aspect ratio; their performance was compared to that of other CLT metal connections, light-frame-shear walls (LFSWs), and the presented design method. Wall properties, backbone curves, ductility, equivalent-energy-elastic-plastic (EEEP) curves, and standard idealized-component backbone, nonlinear modeling parameters, and acceptance criteria were extracted for nonlinear static pushover analysis. Toe-screwed (TS) CLT shear walls exhibited significant energy dissipation due to the head pull-through failure mode found in connection assembly testing. All tests had significant hysteretic pinching and CLT damage. Walls displayed 2.6%–3.7% drift and good strength with rapid secondary backbone degradation. Toe-screwed CLT shear connections using partially threaded, washer-head screws exhibited high strength, stiffness, large hysteresis loops, and ductility compared to other CLT metal connections and LFSWs. The equally spaced and grouped toe-screw connection conditions exhibited 3.4% drift capacity and strength and energy dissipation comparable to those of the wall connections in the reviewed literature. Walls with toe screws and hold-downs exhibited higher strength, lower drift capacity, and good stiffness compared to the equally and grouped toe-screw walls. The results suggest that washer-head, partially threaded toe screws are a viable connection in lateral-force-resisting systems.
    • Download: (1.267Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Toe-Screwed Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Wall Trilinear Pushover Design Modeling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266719
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDillon Fitzgerald
    contributor authorArijit Sinha
    contributor authorThomas H. Miller
    contributor authorJohn A. Nairn
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:13:33Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:13:33Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002683.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266719
    description abstractAlthough toenailing has been common practice in light-frame residential construction, using toe screws in cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls has not been investigated. CLT shear walls with inclined washer-headed, self-tapping screws installed along the wall’s bottom edge into a floor plate were tested to evaluate the shear wall connection. The tested geometry represents platform construction wall-to-floor conditions at the top and bottom of walls in multistory timber buildings. Three CLT shear wall connections—equally spaced toe screws, grouped toe screws, and a combination of toe screws and hold-downs—were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. The full-scale CLT walls had a 2∶1 aspect ratio; their performance was compared to that of other CLT metal connections, light-frame-shear walls (LFSWs), and the presented design method. Wall properties, backbone curves, ductility, equivalent-energy-elastic-plastic (EEEP) curves, and standard idealized-component backbone, nonlinear modeling parameters, and acceptance criteria were extracted for nonlinear static pushover analysis. Toe-screwed (TS) CLT shear walls exhibited significant energy dissipation due to the head pull-through failure mode found in connection assembly testing. All tests had significant hysteretic pinching and CLT damage. Walls displayed 2.6%–3.7% drift and good strength with rapid secondary backbone degradation. Toe-screwed CLT shear connections using partially threaded, washer-head screws exhibited high strength, stiffness, large hysteresis loops, and ductility compared to other CLT metal connections and LFSWs. The equally spaced and grouped toe-screw connection conditions exhibited 3.4% drift capacity and strength and energy dissipation comparable to those of the wall connections in the reviewed literature. Walls with toe screws and hold-downs exhibited higher strength, lower drift capacity, and good stiffness compared to the equally and grouped toe-screw walls. The results suggest that washer-head, partially threaded toe screws are a viable connection in lateral-force-resisting systems.
    publisherASCE
    titleToe-Screwed Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Wall Trilinear Pushover Design Modeling
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002683
    page04020130
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian