YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Strength and Durability Characteristics of Cement-Sand Stabilized Earth Blocks

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Mohammad Shariful Islam
    ,
    Tausif-E-Elahi
    ,
    Azmayeen Rafat Shahriar
    ,
    Kamrun Nahar
    ,
    Tahsin Reza Hossain
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003176
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Conventional building materials like fired clay brick (FCB) and concrete blocks are expensive and, in some cases, have detrimental effect on environment. Compressed stabilized earth block (CSEB) can be an effective alternative that can be easily prepared from locally available clays with little addition of stabilizers. This study is carried out to assess the performance of CSEBs prepared of highly fine-grained soils as a suitable construction material. As such, both stabilized and unstabilized earth blocks were tested and a comparative assessment is made in terms of compressive strength, unit weight, durability, and load-deformation characteristics. Varying proportions of cement, coarse sand (CS), and fine sand (FS) were used in a quest to find an optimum combination for producing CSEB that meet the design criteria outlined in several standards. Inclusion of 50%–60% CS is found to provide maximum density and compressive strength, and beyond 60% CS content, strength begins to drop. CSEBs made with cement ≥6% with proper amount of sand showed better durability. Although addition of mixed sand (CS and FS) was found to be more effective in increasing strength; however, durability was poor. With the increase of cement, water absorption was found to decrease. CSEBs with cement content ≥6% and coarse sand >40% showed water absorption of less than 15%. Moreover, with the increase of cement content, peak stress increases and failure strain decreases, resulting in brittle nature of the material. Some interesting stress–strain response was observed for different cement content at a constant CS content, directing to a conclusive solution. Taking the aforementioned parameters into consideration, optimum proportions of cement, CS, and FS to achieve considerable strength and durability was suggested. Finally, a cost analysis was performed and the prospect of CSEBs as an eco-friendly, and sustainable alternative to conventional masonry units like FCBs was presented.
    • Download: (1.568Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Strength and Durability Characteristics of Cement-Sand Stabilized Earth Blocks

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266294
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohammad Shariful Islam
    contributor authorTausif-E-Elahi
    contributor authorAzmayeen Rafat Shahriar
    contributor authorKamrun Nahar
    contributor authorTahsin Reza Hossain
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:58:08Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:58:08Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003176.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266294
    description abstractConventional building materials like fired clay brick (FCB) and concrete blocks are expensive and, in some cases, have detrimental effect on environment. Compressed stabilized earth block (CSEB) can be an effective alternative that can be easily prepared from locally available clays with little addition of stabilizers. This study is carried out to assess the performance of CSEBs prepared of highly fine-grained soils as a suitable construction material. As such, both stabilized and unstabilized earth blocks were tested and a comparative assessment is made in terms of compressive strength, unit weight, durability, and load-deformation characteristics. Varying proportions of cement, coarse sand (CS), and fine sand (FS) were used in a quest to find an optimum combination for producing CSEB that meet the design criteria outlined in several standards. Inclusion of 50%–60% CS is found to provide maximum density and compressive strength, and beyond 60% CS content, strength begins to drop. CSEBs made with cement ≥6% with proper amount of sand showed better durability. Although addition of mixed sand (CS and FS) was found to be more effective in increasing strength; however, durability was poor. With the increase of cement, water absorption was found to decrease. CSEBs with cement content ≥6% and coarse sand >40% showed water absorption of less than 15%. Moreover, with the increase of cement content, peak stress increases and failure strain decreases, resulting in brittle nature of the material. Some interesting stress–strain response was observed for different cement content at a constant CS content, directing to a conclusive solution. Taking the aforementioned parameters into consideration, optimum proportions of cement, CS, and FS to achieve considerable strength and durability was suggested. Finally, a cost analysis was performed and the prospect of CSEBs as an eco-friendly, and sustainable alternative to conventional masonry units like FCBs was presented.
    publisherASCE
    titleStrength and Durability Characteristics of Cement-Sand Stabilized Earth Blocks
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003176
    page04020087
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian