YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Resistivity Measurement of Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Robert L. Parsons
    ,
    Zachary A. Brady
    ,
    Tanya N. Walkenbach
    ,
    Jie Han
    ,
    Stacey Kulesza
    ,
    James Brennan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003013
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls often include galvanized steel strips as mechanical reinforcement within layers of specified backfill material. Galvanized steel reinforcement provides considerable tensile strength; however, it is potentially vulnerable to corrosion. Corrosivity of MSE backfill material is typically characterized using electrical resistivity. Many variations of the current AASHTO T288 standard exist to determine this resistivity. However, there is concern that this method may not reflect field conditions, particularly for aggregate backfills, and thus may mischaracterize the corrosivity of these backfill materials. ASTM currently has a proposed standard for coarse aggregate resistivity that addresses this mischaracterization. Five aggregate backfill materials were collected during construction from MSE wall projects located in eastern Kansas. These materials were laboratory-tested using two methods: (1) the current AASHTO standard and (2) a proposed ASTM test method for coarse aggregate resistivity. Results from the laboratory testing were compared with field resistivity measurements of two of the MSE wall backfills post-construction. The proposed ASTM test method appeared to more accurately simulate field conditions behind MSE walls. Increasing the number of soak/drain cycles substantially increased measured resistivity. Recommendations are made based on data included in this paper that should lead to more representative resistivity testing results. These include a minimum electrode spacing of 8:1 and a minimum height of the test box that is three times the maximum particle size.
    • Download: (1.037Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Resistivity Measurement of Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266154
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRobert L. Parsons
    contributor authorZachary A. Brady
    contributor authorTanya N. Walkenbach
    contributor authorJie Han
    contributor authorStacey Kulesza
    contributor authorJames Brennan
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:53:28Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:53:28Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003013.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266154
    description abstractMechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls often include galvanized steel strips as mechanical reinforcement within layers of specified backfill material. Galvanized steel reinforcement provides considerable tensile strength; however, it is potentially vulnerable to corrosion. Corrosivity of MSE backfill material is typically characterized using electrical resistivity. Many variations of the current AASHTO T288 standard exist to determine this resistivity. However, there is concern that this method may not reflect field conditions, particularly for aggregate backfills, and thus may mischaracterize the corrosivity of these backfill materials. ASTM currently has a proposed standard for coarse aggregate resistivity that addresses this mischaracterization. Five aggregate backfill materials were collected during construction from MSE wall projects located in eastern Kansas. These materials were laboratory-tested using two methods: (1) the current AASHTO standard and (2) a proposed ASTM test method for coarse aggregate resistivity. Results from the laboratory testing were compared with field resistivity measurements of two of the MSE wall backfills post-construction. The proposed ASTM test method appeared to more accurately simulate field conditions behind MSE walls. Increasing the number of soak/drain cycles substantially increased measured resistivity. Recommendations are made based on data included in this paper that should lead to more representative resistivity testing results. These include a minimum electrode spacing of 8:1 and a minimum height of the test box that is three times the maximum particle size.
    publisherASCE
    titleResistivity Measurement of Backfill for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003013
    page04019367
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian