YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Study of the Application of Public Contract Laws on Construction Projects

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Amr Abu Helw
    ,
    A. Samer Ezeldin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000414
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Local governments and public authorities conclude contracts for the purpose of acquisition of goods, delivery of services, and construction of public facilities like bridges, infrastructure, and public buildings. A public contract is an agreement to perform particular tasks that are financed by government funds for the benefit of the whole community. Private entities and corporations are subject to stricter standards in their dealings with the government than in private transactions. Conversely, the government must deal fairly and equitably with those who contract with it to achieve successful implementation of the projects. On October 3, 2018, the new Public Contracts Law No. 182 of 2018 was published in Egypt to regulate in considerable detail several types of public construction administrative contracts and to provide a comprehensive legal regime of public procurement. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive comparison between such public contracts law and the corresponding laws in Middle Eastern and European countries adopting a civil or common law system. The comparison is concerned with two subjects in construction administrative contracts, namely, arbitration and termination. The comparison identifies some limitations of the provisions of the new Egyptian public contracts law in that regard. Some amendments are suggested to make the administrative contract more equitable and attractive to private entities.
    • Download: (201.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Study of the Application of Public Contract Laws on Construction Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266037
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAmr Abu Helw
    contributor authorA. Samer Ezeldin
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:49:22Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:49:22Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000414.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266037
    description abstractLocal governments and public authorities conclude contracts for the purpose of acquisition of goods, delivery of services, and construction of public facilities like bridges, infrastructure, and public buildings. A public contract is an agreement to perform particular tasks that are financed by government funds for the benefit of the whole community. Private entities and corporations are subject to stricter standards in their dealings with the government than in private transactions. Conversely, the government must deal fairly and equitably with those who contract with it to achieve successful implementation of the projects. On October 3, 2018, the new Public Contracts Law No. 182 of 2018 was published in Egypt to regulate in considerable detail several types of public construction administrative contracts and to provide a comprehensive legal regime of public procurement. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive comparison between such public contracts law and the corresponding laws in Middle Eastern and European countries adopting a civil or common law system. The comparison is concerned with two subjects in construction administrative contracts, namely, arbitration and termination. The comparison identifies some limitations of the provisions of the new Egyptian public contracts law in that regard. Some amendments are suggested to make the administrative contract more equitable and attractive to private entities.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparative Study of the Application of Public Contract Laws on Construction Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000414
    page04520026
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian