YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Managing the Risks of Third-Party Sustainability Certification Failures

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Mohamed-Asem U. Abdul-Malak
    ,
    Fawzi G. Khalife
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000407
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The environmental risk levels are on the increase worldwide. As a result, building construction projects have been witnessing a paradigm shift in the way their development plans are approached, with more buildings being designed and constructed to sustainability standards that are higher than those customarily applied for traditional buildings. This experienced change has contributed to adding new challenges to the management of such projects, primarily due to the more stringent specifications being used and certifications sought. As such, the risks pertaining to third-party certification failures rank among the top challenges that arise on a sustainable building project (SBP). This is owing to the importance of certification in terms of materializing an array of projects benefits, including securing capital funding, providing better social publicity, achieving higher market values, and taking advantage of tax incentives. This paper studied SBP certification risks by examining how such risks are addressed through the contract terms and inquiring about the perspectives of concerned professionals as to the approaches being adopted for dealing with these risks. The adopted methodology involved (1) examining relevant contract terms found to be used by three standard contract forms, and (2) conducting a survey study that aimed at reflecting the state of practice in relation to addressing certifications and their related risks. The findings based on the response of participating professionals ranked the preferred approaches that are being followed in the case of certification failure as follows: (1) retaining control by the project owner in dealing with the ensued damages, (2) obliging the participant principally responsible for seeking certification to cure the situation, (3) waiving damages, and (4) applying green liquidated damages. The paper concludes with a proposed framework that can be followed by SBP owners for deciding on the appropriate basket of remedies for dealing with sustainability certification-failure risks.
    • Download: (1.285Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Managing the Risks of Third-Party Sustainability Certification Failures

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266033
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohamed-Asem U. Abdul-Malak
    contributor authorFawzi G. Khalife
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:49:11Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:49:11Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000407.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266033
    description abstractThe environmental risk levels are on the increase worldwide. As a result, building construction projects have been witnessing a paradigm shift in the way their development plans are approached, with more buildings being designed and constructed to sustainability standards that are higher than those customarily applied for traditional buildings. This experienced change has contributed to adding new challenges to the management of such projects, primarily due to the more stringent specifications being used and certifications sought. As such, the risks pertaining to third-party certification failures rank among the top challenges that arise on a sustainable building project (SBP). This is owing to the importance of certification in terms of materializing an array of projects benefits, including securing capital funding, providing better social publicity, achieving higher market values, and taking advantage of tax incentives. This paper studied SBP certification risks by examining how such risks are addressed through the contract terms and inquiring about the perspectives of concerned professionals as to the approaches being adopted for dealing with these risks. The adopted methodology involved (1) examining relevant contract terms found to be used by three standard contract forms, and (2) conducting a survey study that aimed at reflecting the state of practice in relation to addressing certifications and their related risks. The findings based on the response of participating professionals ranked the preferred approaches that are being followed in the case of certification failure as follows: (1) retaining control by the project owner in dealing with the ensued damages, (2) obliging the participant principally responsible for seeking certification to cure the situation, (3) waiving damages, and (4) applying green liquidated damages. The paper concludes with a proposed framework that can be followed by SBP owners for deciding on the appropriate basket of remedies for dealing with sustainability certification-failure risks.
    publisherASCE
    titleManaging the Risks of Third-Party Sustainability Certification Failures
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000407
    page04520027
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian