YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Investigation of Legal Issues in Construction-Manager-at-Risk Projects: Case Study of Airport Projects

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Pramen P. Shrestha
    ,
    Brandon Davis
    ,
    Ghada M. Gad
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000404
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The use of alternative project delivery methods has increased significantly in the last decade. In the past, airport projects were designed and constructed using the traditional design-bid-build delivery method. However, recently airport owners have been extensively using construction-manager-at-risk (CMAR), lump-sum design-build, and progressive design-build to build both landside and airside projects. As new project delivery methods are used, airports have learned lessons related to legal and contractual issues in these types of projects. The objective of this paper is to investigate and highlight legal issues that arise in medium to large CMAR airport projects during design, construction, and closeout phases. The study covers legal issues related to design, environmental permitting, contract procurement and management, construction phasing, insurance requirements, local issues and outreach, dispute resolution methods, funding, hazardous material remediation, incentives and disincentives, project closeout, and operation and maintenance of these airport projects. To achieve the objective of this study, the paper utilized a case study methodology by gathering and analyzing contract documents from airport CMAR projects, as well as interviewing the project managers and construction lawyers working on these projects. Some of the lessons learned using the CMAR method were to ensure that the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and local laws allow for the procurement of these types of projects, as well as understanding the fact that design and construction management in these types of projects vastly differ from the traditional method. Other lessons learned, related to insurance, environmental permitting, dispute resolutions, and project labor agreements are discussed. Recommendations stemming from these findings are also highlighted, so airport owners will be aware of legal issues that can potentially arise on airport CMAR projects.
    • Download: (381.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Investigation of Legal Issues in Construction-Manager-at-Risk Projects: Case Study of Airport Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266030
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPramen P. Shrestha
    contributor authorBrandon Davis
    contributor authorGhada M. Gad
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:49:02Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:49:02Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000404.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266030
    description abstractThe use of alternative project delivery methods has increased significantly in the last decade. In the past, airport projects were designed and constructed using the traditional design-bid-build delivery method. However, recently airport owners have been extensively using construction-manager-at-risk (CMAR), lump-sum design-build, and progressive design-build to build both landside and airside projects. As new project delivery methods are used, airports have learned lessons related to legal and contractual issues in these types of projects. The objective of this paper is to investigate and highlight legal issues that arise in medium to large CMAR airport projects during design, construction, and closeout phases. The study covers legal issues related to design, environmental permitting, contract procurement and management, construction phasing, insurance requirements, local issues and outreach, dispute resolution methods, funding, hazardous material remediation, incentives and disincentives, project closeout, and operation and maintenance of these airport projects. To achieve the objective of this study, the paper utilized a case study methodology by gathering and analyzing contract documents from airport CMAR projects, as well as interviewing the project managers and construction lawyers working on these projects. Some of the lessons learned using the CMAR method were to ensure that the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and local laws allow for the procurement of these types of projects, as well as understanding the fact that design and construction management in these types of projects vastly differ from the traditional method. Other lessons learned, related to insurance, environmental permitting, dispute resolutions, and project labor agreements are discussed. Recommendations stemming from these findings are also highlighted, so airport owners will be aware of legal issues that can potentially arise on airport CMAR projects.
    publisherASCE
    titleInvestigation of Legal Issues in Construction-Manager-at-Risk Projects: Case Study of Airport Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000404
    page04520022
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian