YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Project Delivery Methods’ Change-Order Types and Magnitudes Experienced in Highway Construction

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Douglas Alleman
    ,
    Arthur L. C. Antoine
    ,
    M. Scott Stanford
    ,
    Keith R. Molenaar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000380
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Controlling construction change orders and associated cost growth can be a challenge for highway agencies and is a topic of interest for both practitioners and researchers. Change-order management is particularly crucial on projects using alternative delivery methods with agencies choosing these alternative methods in part to help manage this challenge. Despite the importance, few studies have explored the relationship between change orders and project delivery methods. As such, this study examined the relationships among delivery methods and the types and magnitude of change orders in highway construction. The types of change orders studied are restricted to categories established by the literature and industry. The data set for this study included 162 US highway projects completed between 2004 and 2015. Interviews with agency members working on select projects from the data set were also performed to supplement the quantitative data. The findings reveal that unforeseen condition changes have the most substantial impact on the total cost growth, followed by agency-directed change orders. Agency-directed change orders were found to often add value as a result of owner agencies taking advantage of an initial contract surplus with the greatest benefits realized in design-build delivery. The results of this study provide evidence for agencies and researchers to better understand reasons for change orders across delivery methods and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies.
    • Download: (209.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Project Delivery Methods’ Change-Order Types and Magnitudes Experienced in Highway Construction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266013
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDouglas Alleman
    contributor authorArthur L. C. Antoine
    contributor authorM. Scott Stanford
    contributor authorKeith R. Molenaar
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:48:26Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:48:26Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000380.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266013
    description abstractControlling construction change orders and associated cost growth can be a challenge for highway agencies and is a topic of interest for both practitioners and researchers. Change-order management is particularly crucial on projects using alternative delivery methods with agencies choosing these alternative methods in part to help manage this challenge. Despite the importance, few studies have explored the relationship between change orders and project delivery methods. As such, this study examined the relationships among delivery methods and the types and magnitude of change orders in highway construction. The types of change orders studied are restricted to categories established by the literature and industry. The data set for this study included 162 US highway projects completed between 2004 and 2015. Interviews with agency members working on select projects from the data set were also performed to supplement the quantitative data. The findings reveal that unforeseen condition changes have the most substantial impact on the total cost growth, followed by agency-directed change orders. Agency-directed change orders were found to often add value as a result of owner agencies taking advantage of an initial contract surplus with the greatest benefits realized in design-build delivery. The results of this study provide evidence for agencies and researchers to better understand reasons for change orders across delivery methods and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies.
    publisherASCE
    titleProject Delivery Methods’ Change-Order Types and Magnitudes Experienced in Highway Construction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000380
    page04520006
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian