Show simple item record

contributor authorNils J. Gransberg
contributor authorDouglas D. Gransberg
date accessioned2022-01-30T19:47:24Z
date available2022-01-30T19:47:24Z
date issued2020
identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000339.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265983
description abstractThe primary benefits of construction manager-at-risk (CMAR) project delivery are associated with increasing the ultimate constructability of a project by bringing the construction contractor to the project during the design phase. This paper reports the results of a content analysis of 24 published CMAR case studies worth $5.4 billion in both the commercial and public infrastructure sectors and derives four lessons learned. The major finding was that owners must synchronize the clauses of design contracts with those of the preconstruction in order to promote the level of collaboration necessary to realize enhanced constructability. This study also found that engaging CMAR contractors as early as is practical, clearly defining the deliverables they will produce during preconstruction, and limiting the cost component of best value selections to only CMAR fees facilitates project success. This paper’s major contribution is in comparing commercial and infrastructure CMAR projects and finding common lessons learned.
publisherASCE
titlePublic Project Construction Manager-at-Risk Contracts: Lessons Learned from a Comparison of Commercial and Infrastructure Projects
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000339
page04519039
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record