YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Mitigating Risk of Confined Explosion via Lightweight Sacrificial Cladding

    Source: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2020:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Yasser A. Khalifa
    ,
    Manuel Campidelli
    ,
    Michael J. Tait
    ,
    Wael W. El-Dakhakhni
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001331
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: A confined explosion inside a critical facility may lead to the total paralysis of pertinent operations. Practical solutions to mitigate such risk include lightweight sacrificial cladding, which can be deployed as a physical barrier to protect high importance (i.e., critical) facilities from potential explosions. More specifically, sandwich panels have the potential for high energy dissipation at a relatively low cost, which makes them suitable for multiple cladding applications against a range of blast-threat scenarios. To investigate the effectiveness of sandwich panels against such threats, the results of an experimental study carried out by the authors are presented herein. The study includes 18 cold-formed steel sandwich panels featuring two core configurations selected on the basis of the resistance and modes of failure of nominally identical panels previously tested under quasistatic loading. The dynamic response of each panel configuration to the detonation of six different charges of composition C-4 at a constant standoff distance is analyzed in this paper. The test results are presented in terms of response histories, peak displacements, and observed modes of failure, while the damage levels exhibited by each panel are related to the response limits specified in design standards currently adopted in North America for the blast protection of buildings. Considerations of energy absorption and scalability suggest that panels with a unidirectional core configuration may be preferable for blast risk mitigation.
    • Download: (1.043Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Mitigating Risk of Confined Explosion via Lightweight Sacrificial Cladding

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265906
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYasser A. Khalifa
    contributor authorManuel Campidelli
    contributor authorMichael J. Tait
    contributor authorWael W. El-Dakhakhni
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:44:58Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:44:58Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CF.1943-5509.0001331.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265906
    description abstractA confined explosion inside a critical facility may lead to the total paralysis of pertinent operations. Practical solutions to mitigate such risk include lightweight sacrificial cladding, which can be deployed as a physical barrier to protect high importance (i.e., critical) facilities from potential explosions. More specifically, sandwich panels have the potential for high energy dissipation at a relatively low cost, which makes them suitable for multiple cladding applications against a range of blast-threat scenarios. To investigate the effectiveness of sandwich panels against such threats, the results of an experimental study carried out by the authors are presented herein. The study includes 18 cold-formed steel sandwich panels featuring two core configurations selected on the basis of the resistance and modes of failure of nominally identical panels previously tested under quasistatic loading. The dynamic response of each panel configuration to the detonation of six different charges of composition C-4 at a constant standoff distance is analyzed in this paper. The test results are presented in terms of response histories, peak displacements, and observed modes of failure, while the damage levels exhibited by each panel are related to the response limits specified in design standards currently adopted in North America for the blast protection of buildings. Considerations of energy absorption and scalability suggest that panels with a unidirectional core configuration may be preferable for blast risk mitigation.
    publisherASCE
    titleMitigating Risk of Confined Explosion via Lightweight Sacrificial Cladding
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001331
    page04019080
    treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2020:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian