YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Margin of Safety in TMDLs: Natural Language Processing-Aided Review of the State of Practice

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Robert Nunoo
    ,
    Paul Anderson
    ,
    Saurav Kumar
    ,
    Jun-Jie Zhu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001889
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The margin of safety (MOS) accounts for uncertainties in the total maximum daily load (TMDL) development process and the variabilities involved in simulating systems, providing a complete description of the degree of protection for a waterbody. Despite numerous discussions on the estimation and incorporation of MOS in TMDLs, there are few post-TMDL studies about the MOS selection process, and there are limited guidelines for selecting MOS values. In this study, natural language processing was employed to review MOS values of TMDLs approved between 2002 and 2016. Reasons such as type of impairment, waterbody types, and designated waterbody given by TMDL developers for chosen MOS values uses were explored. MOS values across states and United States Environmental Protection Agency regions were also analyzed and compared. The results suggested the MOS value of 10% of the estimated load capacity of a waterbody is the most used value across the states and territories of the United States and that 84% of the explicit MOS values selected were not based on any uncertainty estimation method. In addition, the waterbody type and the designated water-use category appear to be correlated with MOS values, and lakes and designated use for aquatic life protection generally had larger MOS values.
    • Download: (794.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Margin of Safety in TMDLs: Natural Language Processing-Aided Review of the State of Practice

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265834
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRobert Nunoo
    contributor authorPaul Anderson
    contributor authorSaurav Kumar
    contributor authorJun-Jie Zhu
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:42:36Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:42:36Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001889.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265834
    description abstractThe margin of safety (MOS) accounts for uncertainties in the total maximum daily load (TMDL) development process and the variabilities involved in simulating systems, providing a complete description of the degree of protection for a waterbody. Despite numerous discussions on the estimation and incorporation of MOS in TMDLs, there are few post-TMDL studies about the MOS selection process, and there are limited guidelines for selecting MOS values. In this study, natural language processing was employed to review MOS values of TMDLs approved between 2002 and 2016. Reasons such as type of impairment, waterbody types, and designated waterbody given by TMDL developers for chosen MOS values uses were explored. MOS values across states and United States Environmental Protection Agency regions were also analyzed and compared. The results suggested the MOS value of 10% of the estimated load capacity of a waterbody is the most used value across the states and territories of the United States and that 84% of the explicit MOS values selected were not based on any uncertainty estimation method. In addition, the waterbody type and the designated water-use category appear to be correlated with MOS values, and lakes and designated use for aquatic life protection generally had larger MOS values.
    publisherASCE
    titleMargin of Safety in TMDLs: Natural Language Processing-Aided Review of the State of Practice
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001889
    page04020002
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian