YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Poroelastoplastic Borehole Modeling by Tangent Stiffness Matrix Method

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2020:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Hua Zhang
    ,
    Shunde Yin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001618
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The stability of borehole is a major concern in petroleum and geotechnical engineering. Subsurface fossil fuel and thermal energy extraction, deep geologic carbon/energy storage, and waste disposal require sophisticated borehole modeling. In many instances in deep well drilling, rock exhibits a plastic behavior rather than a pure linear elastic behavior. Rock is a porous material consisting of a compressible solid matrix and number of compressible fluids occupying the pore space, so numerical analysis of complex borehole problems based on nonlinear poromechanics is indispensable. In computer methods for nonlinear poromechanics, it is expected that the tangent stiffness method is more efficient than the constant stiffness method because the number of iterations can be reduced; however, the speculation has not been corroborated, especially when applied in borehole engineering. To investigate the computational efficiency of the two methods, fully coupled poroelastoplastic borehole modeling was implemented by both the tangent stiffness and initial (or constant) stiffness methods. Results showed that the two calculation methods are consistent, and the computational performance of the tangent stiffness method is superior to the initial stiffness method based on borehole modeling, reflected in the significantly reduced number of iterations and total running time required.
    • Download: (1017.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Poroelastoplastic Borehole Modeling by Tangent Stiffness Matrix Method

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265651
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHua Zhang
    contributor authorShunde Yin
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:37:00Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:37:00Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0001618.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265651
    description abstractThe stability of borehole is a major concern in petroleum and geotechnical engineering. Subsurface fossil fuel and thermal energy extraction, deep geologic carbon/energy storage, and waste disposal require sophisticated borehole modeling. In many instances in deep well drilling, rock exhibits a plastic behavior rather than a pure linear elastic behavior. Rock is a porous material consisting of a compressible solid matrix and number of compressible fluids occupying the pore space, so numerical analysis of complex borehole problems based on nonlinear poromechanics is indispensable. In computer methods for nonlinear poromechanics, it is expected that the tangent stiffness method is more efficient than the constant stiffness method because the number of iterations can be reduced; however, the speculation has not been corroborated, especially when applied in borehole engineering. To investigate the computational efficiency of the two methods, fully coupled poroelastoplastic borehole modeling was implemented by both the tangent stiffness and initial (or constant) stiffness methods. Results showed that the two calculation methods are consistent, and the computational performance of the tangent stiffness method is superior to the initial stiffness method based on borehole modeling, reflected in the significantly reduced number of iterations and total running time required.
    publisherASCE
    titlePoroelastoplastic Borehole Modeling by Tangent Stiffness Matrix Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue3
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001618
    page04020010
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2020:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian