YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comprehensive Evaluation of Strength Criteria for Granite, Marble, and Sandstone Based on Polyaxial Experimental Tests

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2020:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Fan Feng
    ,
    Xibing Li
    ,
    Kun Du
    ,
    Diyuan Li
    ,
    Jamal Rostami
    ,
    Shaofeng Wang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001544
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Cubic specimens of three rocks—granite, marble, and sandstone, representing very strong rock, moderately strong rock, and weak rock, respectively—were tested under polyaxial stress. The objective was to determine the optimal strength criteria for these rocks by using the polyaxial test data. Experimental results indicated that the failure strength considerably depended on σ2 and σ3 for all the rocks. Seven well-known rock-strength criteria were employed to examine the true-triaxial data with regard to the predictability in practical applications, comparison between the best-fitting functions (experimental data) and theoretical (predicted) solutions, stress trajectories on the deviatoric plane, and stress trajectories on the meridian plane and τoct−σoct space. A detailed analysis and comparison of these criteria showed that the Mogi–Coulomb criterion, modified Wiebols–Cook criterion, and modified Lade criterion provided a better prediction of the polyaxial strength for the three rocks in most cases, which is attributed to the high σ2 dependence and sensitivity of the selected rocks. The Mogi 1971 and 1967 criteria could not be correlated to the strength parameters (cohesion and frictional angle) and failed to predict the real strength values of an in situ rock mass without complex polyaxial compression tests. Furthermore, the stress trajectories on the deviatoric plane illustrated their disadvantages in theoretical interpretation and numerical implementation. The inferiority of the Mohr–Coulomb criterion and Drucker–Prager (DP) criterion in describing the rock strength under polyaxial stress was verified by the higher deviation between the theoretical (predicted) strength values and experimental strength values. The nonconformity between the stress trajectories and experimental data for the Mohr–Coulomb criterion and DP criterion on the meridian plane and in the τoct−σoct space validates the preceding viewpoint.
    • Download: (13.82Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comprehensive Evaluation of Strength Criteria for Granite, Marble, and Sandstone Based on Polyaxial Experimental Tests

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265585
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFan Feng
    contributor authorXibing Li
    contributor authorKun Du
    contributor authorDiyuan Li
    contributor authorJamal Rostami
    contributor authorShaofeng Wang
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:34:53Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:34:53Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0001544.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265585
    description abstractCubic specimens of three rocks—granite, marble, and sandstone, representing very strong rock, moderately strong rock, and weak rock, respectively—were tested under polyaxial stress. The objective was to determine the optimal strength criteria for these rocks by using the polyaxial test data. Experimental results indicated that the failure strength considerably depended on σ2 and σ3 for all the rocks. Seven well-known rock-strength criteria were employed to examine the true-triaxial data with regard to the predictability in practical applications, comparison between the best-fitting functions (experimental data) and theoretical (predicted) solutions, stress trajectories on the deviatoric plane, and stress trajectories on the meridian plane and τoct−σoct space. A detailed analysis and comparison of these criteria showed that the Mogi–Coulomb criterion, modified Wiebols–Cook criterion, and modified Lade criterion provided a better prediction of the polyaxial strength for the three rocks in most cases, which is attributed to the high σ2 dependence and sensitivity of the selected rocks. The Mogi 1971 and 1967 criteria could not be correlated to the strength parameters (cohesion and frictional angle) and failed to predict the real strength values of an in situ rock mass without complex polyaxial compression tests. Furthermore, the stress trajectories on the deviatoric plane illustrated their disadvantages in theoretical interpretation and numerical implementation. The inferiority of the Mohr–Coulomb criterion and Drucker–Prager (DP) criterion in describing the rock strength under polyaxial stress was verified by the higher deviation between the theoretical (predicted) strength values and experimental strength values. The nonconformity between the stress trajectories and experimental data for the Mohr–Coulomb criterion and DP criterion on the meridian plane and in the τoct−σoct space validates the preceding viewpoint.
    publisherASCE
    titleComprehensive Evaluation of Strength Criteria for Granite, Marble, and Sandstone Based on Polyaxial Experimental Tests
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue2
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001544
    page04019155
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2020:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian