YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Light Reflectiveness of Modern Pavement: Standard Tungsten Incandescent and LED

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Jeremy Rice
    ,
    Young Hoon Kim
    ,
    Zhihui Sun
    ,
    J. P. Mohsen
    DOI: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000148
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The objective of this research was to evaluate the reflectiveness of the two most commonly used modern pavement systems in the United States (concrete and asphalt). The R table used for roadway lighting design were established several decades ago as a critical parameter for determining the light reflectivity (luminance) of pavement surfaces. With the existence of modern pavement systems and also the new lighting technologies, it is necessary to examine the applicability and representability of the current R table. A total of 12 different pavement surfaces were evaluated to characterize the light reflectivity of two light sources [incandescent and light-emitting diodes (LEDs)]. The reflective properties of the pavements were evaluated considering the influence of angular light (incident lighting angles), defined as observation angle (α), rotation angle (β), and incident angle (γ). The testing program evaluated five incident angles, (0°, 27°, 45°, 63°, and 79°) between the observation plane and the incident light plane (γ). These five angular measurements were repeated with the combination of four rotation angles (0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°) measured between the incidence light plane and the observation plane (β). A total of 1,200 luminance measurements were performed on 12 pavements, four cast or cored pavement samples together with eight in situ field-tested pavements. Light intensity (illuminance) and pavement reflectivity (luminance) were measured. A customized portable goniometer was used to measure the light reflectivity of various pavements. Research results showed that there is statistical difference in light reflectiveness of concrete and asphalt with respect to different light sources. In addition, the angular light distribution significantly differs between standard (incandescent) and LED lights. In addition, the proposed testing method cannot only efficiently evaluate light reflectiveness in the field but also captures light reflectiveness of surface conditions exposed to various light sources.
    • Download: (2.487Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Light Reflectiveness of Modern Pavement: Standard Tungsten Incandescent and LED

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264844
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJeremy Rice
    contributor authorYoung Hoon Kim
    contributor authorZhihui Sun
    contributor authorJ. P. Mohsen
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:12:12Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:12:12Z
    date issued2020
    identifier otherJPEODX.0000148.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264844
    description abstractThe objective of this research was to evaluate the reflectiveness of the two most commonly used modern pavement systems in the United States (concrete and asphalt). The R table used for roadway lighting design were established several decades ago as a critical parameter for determining the light reflectivity (luminance) of pavement surfaces. With the existence of modern pavement systems and also the new lighting technologies, it is necessary to examine the applicability and representability of the current R table. A total of 12 different pavement surfaces were evaluated to characterize the light reflectivity of two light sources [incandescent and light-emitting diodes (LEDs)]. The reflective properties of the pavements were evaluated considering the influence of angular light (incident lighting angles), defined as observation angle (α), rotation angle (β), and incident angle (γ). The testing program evaluated five incident angles, (0°, 27°, 45°, 63°, and 79°) between the observation plane and the incident light plane (γ). These five angular measurements were repeated with the combination of four rotation angles (0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°) measured between the incidence light plane and the observation plane (β). A total of 1,200 luminance measurements were performed on 12 pavements, four cast or cored pavement samples together with eight in situ field-tested pavements. Light intensity (illuminance) and pavement reflectivity (luminance) were measured. A customized portable goniometer was used to measure the light reflectivity of various pavements. Research results showed that there is statistical difference in light reflectiveness of concrete and asphalt with respect to different light sources. In addition, the angular light distribution significantly differs between standard (incandescent) and LED lights. In addition, the proposed testing method cannot only efficiently evaluate light reflectiveness in the field but also captures light reflectiveness of surface conditions exposed to various light sources.
    publisherASCE
    titleEvaluation of Light Reflectiveness of Modern Pavement: Standard Tungsten Incandescent and LED
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.0000148
    page04020007
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian