YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of HF Radar in Mapping Surface Currents under Different Sea States

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2020:;volume( 37 ):;issue: 008::page 1403
    Author:
    Wei, Guomei;He, Zhigang;Xie, Yanshuang;Shang, Shaoping;Dai, Hao;Wu, Jingyu;Liu, Ke;Lin, Rui;Wan, Yan;Lin, Hang;Chen, Jinrui;Li, Yan
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0130.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Two Ocean State Monitoring and Analyzing Radar (OSMAR071) (7.8 MHz) high-frequency (HF) radars and four moored ADCPs were operated concurrently in the southwestern Taiwan Strait during January–March 2013. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of surface currents were conducted between the HF radars and the ADCPs. Except for a location probably affected by shallow water and sand waves on the Taiwan Banks, the HF-radar-derived radial currents (radials) showed good agreement with the ADCP measured results (correlation coefficient: 0.89–0.98; rms difference: 0.07–0.13 m s−1). To provide further insight into the geophysical processes involved, the performance of the HF-radar-derived radials was further evaluated under different sea states (sea states: 2–6). It was found that both the data returns of the radar-derived radials and the differences between the radar-derived radials and the ADCP-derived radials varied with sea state. The HF radar performed best at sea state 4 in terms of data returns. The spatial coverage increased rapidly as the waves increased from sea state 2 to 4. However, it decreased slowly from sea state 4 to 6. Second, the radial differences were relatively high under lower sea states (2 and 3) at the location where the best agreement was obtained between the radar and ADCP radials, whereas the differences increased as the sea states increased at the other three locations. The differences between the radials measured by the HF radars and the ADCPs could be attributed to wave-induced Stokes drift and spatial sampling differences.
    • Download: (4.160Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessment of HF Radar in Mapping Surface Currents under Different Sea States

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264537
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWei, Guomei;He, Zhigang;Xie, Yanshuang;Shang, Shaoping;Dai, Hao;Wu, Jingyu;Liu, Ke;Lin, Rui;Wan, Yan;Lin, Hang;Chen, Jinrui;Li, Yan
    date accessioned2022-01-30T18:07:46Z
    date available2022-01-30T18:07:46Z
    date copyright8/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherjtechd190130.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264537
    description abstractTwo Ocean State Monitoring and Analyzing Radar (OSMAR071) (7.8 MHz) high-frequency (HF) radars and four moored ADCPs were operated concurrently in the southwestern Taiwan Strait during January–March 2013. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of surface currents were conducted between the HF radars and the ADCPs. Except for a location probably affected by shallow water and sand waves on the Taiwan Banks, the HF-radar-derived radial currents (radials) showed good agreement with the ADCP measured results (correlation coefficient: 0.89–0.98; rms difference: 0.07–0.13 m s−1). To provide further insight into the geophysical processes involved, the performance of the HF-radar-derived radials was further evaluated under different sea states (sea states: 2–6). It was found that both the data returns of the radar-derived radials and the differences between the radar-derived radials and the ADCP-derived radials varied with sea state. The HF radar performed best at sea state 4 in terms of data returns. The spatial coverage increased rapidly as the waves increased from sea state 2 to 4. However, it decreased slowly from sea state 4 to 6. Second, the radial differences were relatively high under lower sea states (2 and 3) at the location where the best agreement was obtained between the radar and ADCP radials, whereas the differences increased as the sea states increased at the other three locations. The differences between the radials measured by the HF radars and the ADCPs could be attributed to wave-induced Stokes drift and spatial sampling differences.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAssessment of HF Radar in Mapping Surface Currents under Different Sea States
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume37
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0130.1
    journal fristpage1403
    journal lastpage1422
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2020:;volume( 37 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian