YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainty in observational estimates of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2020:;volume( ):;issue: -::page 1
    Author:
    Thorsen, Tyler J.;Winker, David M.;Ferrare, Richard A.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1009.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A lower-bound on the uncertainty in observational estimates of the aerosol direct radiative effect (DRE, the direct interaction with solar radiation by all aerosols), and the aerosol direct radiative forcing (DRF, the radiative effect of just anthropogenic aerosols, RFari), is quantified by making the optimistic assumption that global aerosol observations can be made with the accuracy found in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sun photometer retrievals. The global mean all-sky aerosol DRE uncertainty was found to be 1.1 Wm-2 (1 standard deviation). The global mean all-sky aerosol DRF (RFari) uncertainty was determined to be 0.31 Wm-2. The total uncertainty in both quantities is dominated by contributions from the aerosol single scattering albedo uncertainty. These uncertainty estimates were compared to a literature survey of mostly satellite-based aerosol DRE/DRF values. Comparisons to previous studies reveal that most have significantly underestimated the aerosol DRE uncertainty. Past estimates of the aerosol DRF uncertainty are smaller (on average) than our optimistic observational estimates, including the aerosol DRF uncertainty given in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report (AR5). This disconnect between our observation-based uncertainty and that found in past aerosol DRF studies that rely, at least in part, on modeling is discussed. Also quantified is a potential reduction in the current observational uncertainty possible with a future generation of satellite observations that would leverage aerosol typing and more refined vertical information.
    • Download: (2.237Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Uncertainty in observational estimates of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264274
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorThorsen, Tyler J.;Winker, David M.;Ferrare, Richard A.
    date accessioned2022-01-30T17:58:13Z
    date available2022-01-30T17:58:13Z
    date copyright10/19/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherjclid191009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264274
    description abstractA lower-bound on the uncertainty in observational estimates of the aerosol direct radiative effect (DRE, the direct interaction with solar radiation by all aerosols), and the aerosol direct radiative forcing (DRF, the radiative effect of just anthropogenic aerosols, RFari), is quantified by making the optimistic assumption that global aerosol observations can be made with the accuracy found in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sun photometer retrievals. The global mean all-sky aerosol DRE uncertainty was found to be 1.1 Wm-2 (1 standard deviation). The global mean all-sky aerosol DRF (RFari) uncertainty was determined to be 0.31 Wm-2. The total uncertainty in both quantities is dominated by contributions from the aerosol single scattering albedo uncertainty. These uncertainty estimates were compared to a literature survey of mostly satellite-based aerosol DRE/DRF values. Comparisons to previous studies reveal that most have significantly underestimated the aerosol DRE uncertainty. Past estimates of the aerosol DRF uncertainty are smaller (on average) than our optimistic observational estimates, including the aerosol DRF uncertainty given in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report (AR5). This disconnect between our observation-based uncertainty and that found in past aerosol DRF studies that rely, at least in part, on modeling is discussed. Also quantified is a potential reduction in the current observational uncertainty possible with a future generation of satellite observations that would leverage aerosol typing and more refined vertical information.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUncertainty in observational estimates of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1009.1
    journal fristpage1
    journal lastpage63
    treeJournal of Climate:;2020:;volume( ):;issue: -
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian