YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    ENSO Precipitation Anomalies along the Equatorial Pacific: Moist Static Energy Framework Diagnostics

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2020:;volume( 33 ):;issue: 021::page 9103
    Author:
    Annamalai, H.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0374.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: With the recognition that equatorial Pacific precipitation anomalies are fundamental to global teleconnections during ENSO winters, the present research applies vertically integrated moist static energy (MSE) budget analysis to historical simulations of CMIP5 models. Process-based assessment is carried out to understand if the models capture the differing processes that account for regional precipitation anomalies along the equatorial Pacific and to isolate a few leading processes that account for the diversified precipitation response to similar SST forcing and vice versa. To assess SST biases in CMIP5, analysis is also carried out in AMIP5 solutions. Diagnostics reveal that models have limitations in representing the “sign” of MSE sources and sinks and, even if they do, compensating errors dominate the budget. The diverse response in precipitation depends on model parameterizations that determine anomalous net radiative flux divergence in the column, free troposphere moisture, and MSE export out of the column, although these processes are not independent. Diagnostics derived from AMIP5 solutions support the findings from CMIP5. The implication is that biases in representing any one of these processes are expected to imprint on others, acknowledging the tight connections among moisture, convection, and radiation. CMIP5 models have limitations in representing the basic states in SST and precipitation over the Niño-3.4 region, and the different convective regimes over the equatorial central and eastern Pacific regions with implications for ENSO. Study limitations are that MSE sources/sinks depend on parameterizations and their interactions, making it difficult to isolate one particular process for attribution. Budgets estimated from monthly anomalies do not capture contributions from high-frequency variability that are vital in closing the budgets.
    • Download: (5.358Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      ENSO Precipitation Anomalies along the Equatorial Pacific: Moist Static Energy Framework Diagnostics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264132
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAnnamalai, H.
    date accessioned2022-01-30T17:53:26Z
    date available2022-01-30T17:53:26Z
    date copyright9/24/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherjclid190374.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264132
    description abstractWith the recognition that equatorial Pacific precipitation anomalies are fundamental to global teleconnections during ENSO winters, the present research applies vertically integrated moist static energy (MSE) budget analysis to historical simulations of CMIP5 models. Process-based assessment is carried out to understand if the models capture the differing processes that account for regional precipitation anomalies along the equatorial Pacific and to isolate a few leading processes that account for the diversified precipitation response to similar SST forcing and vice versa. To assess SST biases in CMIP5, analysis is also carried out in AMIP5 solutions. Diagnostics reveal that models have limitations in representing the “sign” of MSE sources and sinks and, even if they do, compensating errors dominate the budget. The diverse response in precipitation depends on model parameterizations that determine anomalous net radiative flux divergence in the column, free troposphere moisture, and MSE export out of the column, although these processes are not independent. Diagnostics derived from AMIP5 solutions support the findings from CMIP5. The implication is that biases in representing any one of these processes are expected to imprint on others, acknowledging the tight connections among moisture, convection, and radiation. CMIP5 models have limitations in representing the basic states in SST and precipitation over the Niño-3.4 region, and the different convective regimes over the equatorial central and eastern Pacific regions with implications for ENSO. Study limitations are that MSE sources/sinks depend on parameterizations and their interactions, making it difficult to isolate one particular process for attribution. Budgets estimated from monthly anomalies do not capture contributions from high-frequency variability that are vital in closing the budgets.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleENSO Precipitation Anomalies along the Equatorial Pacific: Moist Static Energy Framework Diagnostics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume33
    journal issue21
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0374.1
    journal fristpage9103
    journal lastpage9127
    treeJournal of Climate:;2020:;volume( 33 ):;issue: 021
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian