YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Contributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2020:;volume( 77 ):;issue: 008::page 2629
    Author:
    Heymsfield, Andrew J.;Schmitt, Carl;Chen, Chih-Chieh-Jack;Bansemer, Aaron;Gettelman, Andrew;Field, Paul R.;Liu, Chuntao
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0352.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This study is the first to reach a global view of the precipitation process partitioning, using a combination of satellite and global climate modeling data. The pathways investigated are 1) precipitating ice (ice/snow/graupel) that forms above the freezing level and melts to produce rain (S) followed by additional condensation and collection as the melted precipitating ice falls to the surface (R); 2) growth completely through condensation and collection (coalescence), warm rain (W); and 3) precipitating ice (primarily snow) that falls to the surface (SS). To quantify the amounts, data from satellite-based radar measurements—CloudSat, GPM, and TRMM—are used, as well as climate model simulations from the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and the Met Office Unified Model (UM). Total precipitation amounts and the fraction of the total precipitation amount for each of the pathways is examined latitudinally, regionally, and globally. Carefully examining the contributions from the satellite-based products leads to the conclusion that about 57% of Earth’s precipitation follows pathway S, 15% R, 23% W, and 5% SS, each with an uncertainty of ±5%. The percentages differ significantly from the global climate model results, with the UM indicating smaller fractional S, more R, and more SS; and CAM showing appreciably greater S, negative R (indicating net evaporation below the melting layer), a much larger percentage of W and much less SS. Possible reasons for the wide differences between the satellite- and model-based results are discussed.
    • Download: (1.860Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Contributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264053
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHeymsfield, Andrew J.;Schmitt, Carl;Chen, Chih-Chieh-Jack;Bansemer, Aaron;Gettelman, Andrew;Field, Paul R.;Liu, Chuntao
    date accessioned2022-01-30T17:51:07Z
    date available2022-01-30T17:51:07Z
    date copyright7/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherjasd190352.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264053
    description abstractThis study is the first to reach a global view of the precipitation process partitioning, using a combination of satellite and global climate modeling data. The pathways investigated are 1) precipitating ice (ice/snow/graupel) that forms above the freezing level and melts to produce rain (S) followed by additional condensation and collection as the melted precipitating ice falls to the surface (R); 2) growth completely through condensation and collection (coalescence), warm rain (W); and 3) precipitating ice (primarily snow) that falls to the surface (SS). To quantify the amounts, data from satellite-based radar measurements—CloudSat, GPM, and TRMM—are used, as well as climate model simulations from the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and the Met Office Unified Model (UM). Total precipitation amounts and the fraction of the total precipitation amount for each of the pathways is examined latitudinally, regionally, and globally. Carefully examining the contributions from the satellite-based products leads to the conclusion that about 57% of Earth’s precipitation follows pathway S, 15% R, 23% W, and 5% SS, each with an uncertainty of ±5%. The percentages differ significantly from the global climate model results, with the UM indicating smaller fractional S, more R, and more SS; and CAM showing appreciably greater S, negative R (indicating net evaporation below the melting layer), a much larger percentage of W and much less SS. Possible reasons for the wide differences between the satellite- and model-based results are discussed.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleContributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume77
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-19-0352.1
    journal fristpage2629
    journal lastpage2648
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2020:;volume( 77 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian