YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Businger Mechanism for Intermittent Bursting in the Stable Boundary Layer

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2020:;volume( 77 ):;issue: 010::page 3343
    Author:
    van der Linden, Steven J. A.;van de Wiel, Bas J. H.;Petenko, Igor;van Heerwaarden, Chiel C.;Baas, Peter;Jonker, Harmen J. J.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0309.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: High-resolution large-eddy simulations of the Antarctic very stable boundary layer reveal a mechanism for systematic and periodic intermittent bursting. A nonbursting state with a boundary layer height of just 3 m is alternated by a bursting state with a height of ≈5 m. The bursts result from unstable wave growth triggered by a shear-generated Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, as confirmed by linear stability analysis. The shear at the top of the boundary layer is built up by two processes. The upper, quasi-laminar layer accelerates due to the combined effect of the pressure force and rotation by the Coriolis force, while the lower layer decelerates by turbulent friction. During the burst, this shear is eroded and the initial cause of the instability is removed. Subsequently, the interfacial shear builds up again, causing the entire sequence to repeat itself with a time scale of ≈10 min. Despite the clear intermittent bursting, the overall change of the mean wind profile is remarkably small during the cycle. This enables such a fast erosion and recovery of the shear. This mechanism for cyclic bursting is remarkably similar to the mechanism hypothesized by Businger in 1973, with one key difference. Whereas Businger proposes that the flow acceleration in the upper layer results from downward turbulent transfer of high-momentum flow, the current results indicate no turbulent activity in the upper layer, hence requiring another source of momentum. Finally, it would be interesting to construct a climatology of shear-generated intermittency in relation to large-scale conditions to assess the generality of this Businger mechanism.
    • Download: (1.807Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Businger Mechanism for Intermittent Bursting in the Stable Boundary Layer

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264028
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorvan der Linden, Steven J. A.;van de Wiel, Bas J. H.;Petenko, Igor;van Heerwaarden, Chiel C.;Baas, Peter;Jonker, Harmen J. J.
    date accessioned2022-01-30T17:50:24Z
    date available2022-01-30T17:50:24Z
    date copyright9/24/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherjasd190309.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264028
    description abstractHigh-resolution large-eddy simulations of the Antarctic very stable boundary layer reveal a mechanism for systematic and periodic intermittent bursting. A nonbursting state with a boundary layer height of just 3 m is alternated by a bursting state with a height of ≈5 m. The bursts result from unstable wave growth triggered by a shear-generated Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, as confirmed by linear stability analysis. The shear at the top of the boundary layer is built up by two processes. The upper, quasi-laminar layer accelerates due to the combined effect of the pressure force and rotation by the Coriolis force, while the lower layer decelerates by turbulent friction. During the burst, this shear is eroded and the initial cause of the instability is removed. Subsequently, the interfacial shear builds up again, causing the entire sequence to repeat itself with a time scale of ≈10 min. Despite the clear intermittent bursting, the overall change of the mean wind profile is remarkably small during the cycle. This enables such a fast erosion and recovery of the shear. This mechanism for cyclic bursting is remarkably similar to the mechanism hypothesized by Businger in 1973, with one key difference. Whereas Businger proposes that the flow acceleration in the upper layer results from downward turbulent transfer of high-momentum flow, the current results indicate no turbulent activity in the upper layer, hence requiring another source of momentum. Finally, it would be interesting to construct a climatology of shear-generated intermittency in relation to large-scale conditions to assess the generality of this Businger mechanism.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Businger Mechanism for Intermittent Bursting in the Stable Boundary Layer
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume77
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-19-0309.1
    journal fristpage3343
    journal lastpage3360
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2020:;volume( 77 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian