YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Shallow Cumulus Representation and Its Interaction with Radiation and Surface at the Convection Gray Zone

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2019:;volume 147:;issue 007::page 2467
    Author:
    Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Xabier
    ,
    Jiménez, Pedro A.
    ,
    Dudhia, Jimy
    ,
    Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Jordi
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0030.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractThis study presents a systematic analysis of convective parameterizations performance with interactive radiation, microphysics, and surface on an idealized day with shallow convection. To this end, we analyze a suite of mesoscale numerical experiments (i.e., with parameterized turbulence). In the first set, two different convection schemes represent shallow convection at a 9-km resolution. These experiments are then compared with model results omitting convective parameterizations at 9- and 3-km horizontal resolution (gray zone). Relevant in our approach is to compare the results against two simulations by different large-eddy simulation (LES) models. Results show that the mesoscale experiments, including the 3-km resolution, are unable to adequately represent the timing, intensity, height, and extension of the shallow cumulus field. The main differences with LES experiments are the following: a too late onset, too high cloud base, and a too early transport of moisture too high, overestimating the second cloud layer. Related to this, both convective parameterizations produce warm and dry biases of up to 2 K and 2 g kg?1, respectively, in the cloud layer. This misrepresentation of the cloud dynamics leads to overestimated shortwave radiation variability, both spacewise and timewise. Domain-averaged shortwave radiation at the surface, however, compares satisfactorily with LES. The shortwave direct and diffuse partition is misrepresented by the convective parameterizations with an underestimation (overestimation) of diffuse (direct) radiation both locally and, by a relative 40% (10%), of the domain average.
    • Download: (2.566Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Shallow Cumulus Representation and Its Interaction with Radiation and Surface at the Convection Gray Zone

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263887
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Xabier
    contributor authorJiménez, Pedro A.
    contributor authorDudhia, Jimy
    contributor authorVilà-Guerau de Arellano, Jordi
    date accessioned2019-10-05T06:56:15Z
    date available2019-10-05T06:56:15Z
    date copyright5/8/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier otherMWR-D-19-0030.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263887
    description abstractAbstractThis study presents a systematic analysis of convective parameterizations performance with interactive radiation, microphysics, and surface on an idealized day with shallow convection. To this end, we analyze a suite of mesoscale numerical experiments (i.e., with parameterized turbulence). In the first set, two different convection schemes represent shallow convection at a 9-km resolution. These experiments are then compared with model results omitting convective parameterizations at 9- and 3-km horizontal resolution (gray zone). Relevant in our approach is to compare the results against two simulations by different large-eddy simulation (LES) models. Results show that the mesoscale experiments, including the 3-km resolution, are unable to adequately represent the timing, intensity, height, and extension of the shallow cumulus field. The main differences with LES experiments are the following: a too late onset, too high cloud base, and a too early transport of moisture too high, overestimating the second cloud layer. Related to this, both convective parameterizations produce warm and dry biases of up to 2 K and 2 g kg?1, respectively, in the cloud layer. This misrepresentation of the cloud dynamics leads to overestimated shortwave radiation variability, both spacewise and timewise. Domain-averaged shortwave radiation at the surface, however, compares satisfactorily with LES. The shortwave direct and diffuse partition is misrepresented by the convective parameterizations with an underestimation (overestimation) of diffuse (direct) radiation both locally and, by a relative 40% (10%), of the domain average.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleShallow Cumulus Representation and Its Interaction with Radiation and Surface at the Convection Gray Zone
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue7
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-19-0030.1
    journal fristpage2467
    journal lastpage2483
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2019:;volume 147:;issue 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian