YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Improving Soil Heat Flux Accuracy with the Philip Correction Technique

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2019:;volume 020:;issue 007::page 1435
    Author:
    Tong, Bing
    ,
    Sauer, Thomas J.
    ,
    Gao, Zhiqiu
    ,
    Xiao, Xinhua
    ,
    Horton, Robert
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0243.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractSoil heat flux Gs is an important component of the surface energy balance. Soil heat flux plates (SHFPs) are widely used to measure Gs, although several errors are known to occur. The Philip correction has been applied to minimize errors in Gs measured by SHFPs (Gp) if the soil thermal conductivity ?s, SHFP thermal conductivity ?p, and plate geometry function H are known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Philip correction for a variety of SHFPs. The ?p were determined without thermal contact resistance and differed from the manufacturer-specified ?p. A simplified H formulation was similar to or less than the full H equation for different SHFP shapes. The G ratio (Gp/Gs) was sensitive to ?s/?p and H when they were relatively small. Compared with the Gs determined by a gradient method (Gs_grad), the Gp measured under a full corn (Zea mays, L.) canopy in the field underestimated Gs by 38%?62%. After applying the Philip correction, almost all Gp agreed better with Gs_grad. Generally, the Gp corrected with measured plate parameters agreed better with Gs_grad than those corrected with manufacturer-specified values. The Gp corrected with the simplified and full H expression differed for different SHFPs. These results indicate that SHFPs always underestimate Gs and that the performance of the Philip correction is affected by ?p, plate dimensions, and H. An alternative method to measure Gs by a three-needle heat-pulse sensor or a gradient method, in which soil temperature and water content are measured at several depths, is recommended.
    • Download: (1.785Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Improving Soil Heat Flux Accuracy with the Philip Correction Technique

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263873
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTong, Bing
    contributor authorSauer, Thomas J.
    contributor authorGao, Zhiqiu
    contributor authorXiao, Xinhua
    contributor authorHorton, Robert
    date accessioned2019-10-05T06:55:58Z
    date available2019-10-05T06:55:58Z
    date copyright6/6/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier otherJHM-D-18-0243.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263873
    description abstractAbstractSoil heat flux Gs is an important component of the surface energy balance. Soil heat flux plates (SHFPs) are widely used to measure Gs, although several errors are known to occur. The Philip correction has been applied to minimize errors in Gs measured by SHFPs (Gp) if the soil thermal conductivity ?s, SHFP thermal conductivity ?p, and plate geometry function H are known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Philip correction for a variety of SHFPs. The ?p were determined without thermal contact resistance and differed from the manufacturer-specified ?p. A simplified H formulation was similar to or less than the full H equation for different SHFP shapes. The G ratio (Gp/Gs) was sensitive to ?s/?p and H when they were relatively small. Compared with the Gs determined by a gradient method (Gs_grad), the Gp measured under a full corn (Zea mays, L.) canopy in the field underestimated Gs by 38%?62%. After applying the Philip correction, almost all Gp agreed better with Gs_grad. Generally, the Gp corrected with measured plate parameters agreed better with Gs_grad than those corrected with manufacturer-specified values. The Gp corrected with the simplified and full H expression differed for different SHFPs. These results indicate that SHFPs always underestimate Gs and that the performance of the Philip correction is affected by ?p, plate dimensions, and H. An alternative method to measure Gs by a three-needle heat-pulse sensor or a gradient method, in which soil temperature and water content are measured at several depths, is recommended.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleImproving Soil Heat Flux Accuracy with the Philip Correction Technique
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-18-0243.1
    journal fristpage1435
    journal lastpage1448
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2019:;volume 020:;issue 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian