YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating U.S. East Coast Winter Storms in a Multimodel Ensemble Using EOF and Clustering Approaches

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2019:;volume 147:;issue 006::page 1967
    Author:
    Zheng, Minghua
    ,
    Chang, Edmund K. M.
    ,
    Colle, Brian A.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0052.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractEmpirical orthogonal function (EOF) and fuzzy clustering tools were applied to generate and validate scenarios in operational ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) for U.S. East Coast winter storms. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), and Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) EPSs were validated in their ability to capture the analysis scenarios for historical East Coast cyclone cases at lead times of 1?9 days. The ECMWF ensemble has the best performance for the medium- to extended-range forecasts. During this time frame, NCEP and CMC did not perform as well, but a combination of the two models helps reduce the missing rate and alleviates the underdispersion. All ensembles are underdispersed at all ranges, with combined ensembles being less underdispersed than the individual EPSs. The number of outside-of-envelope cases increases with lead time. For a majority of the cases beyond the short range, the verifying analysis does not lie within the ensemble mean group of the multimodel ensemble or within the same direction indicated by any of the individual model means, suggesting that all possible scenarios need to be taken into account. Using the EOF patterns to validate the cyclone properties, the NCEP model tends to show less intensity and displacement biases during 1?3-day lead time, while the ECMWF model has the smallest biases during 4?6 days. Nevertheless, the ECMWF forecast position tends to be biased toward the southwest of the other two models and the analysis.
    • Download: (3.360Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluating U.S. East Coast Winter Storms in a Multimodel Ensemble Using EOF and Clustering Approaches

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263772
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZheng, Minghua
    contributor authorChang, Edmund K. M.
    contributor authorColle, Brian A.
    date accessioned2019-10-05T06:53:55Z
    date available2019-10-05T06:53:55Z
    date copyright3/29/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier otherMWR-D-18-0052.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263772
    description abstractAbstractEmpirical orthogonal function (EOF) and fuzzy clustering tools were applied to generate and validate scenarios in operational ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) for U.S. East Coast winter storms. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), and Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) EPSs were validated in their ability to capture the analysis scenarios for historical East Coast cyclone cases at lead times of 1?9 days. The ECMWF ensemble has the best performance for the medium- to extended-range forecasts. During this time frame, NCEP and CMC did not perform as well, but a combination of the two models helps reduce the missing rate and alleviates the underdispersion. All ensembles are underdispersed at all ranges, with combined ensembles being less underdispersed than the individual EPSs. The number of outside-of-envelope cases increases with lead time. For a majority of the cases beyond the short range, the verifying analysis does not lie within the ensemble mean group of the multimodel ensemble or within the same direction indicated by any of the individual model means, suggesting that all possible scenarios need to be taken into account. Using the EOF patterns to validate the cyclone properties, the NCEP model tends to show less intensity and displacement biases during 1?3-day lead time, while the ECMWF model has the smallest biases during 4?6 days. Nevertheless, the ECMWF forecast position tends to be biased toward the southwest of the other two models and the analysis.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluating U.S. East Coast Winter Storms in a Multimodel Ensemble Using EOF and Clustering Approaches
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue6
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-18-0052.1
    journal fristpage1967
    journal lastpage1987
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2019:;volume 147:;issue 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian