Different Effects of Two ENSO Types on Arctic Surface Temperature in Boreal WinterSource: Journal of Climate:;2019:;volume 032:;issue 016::page 4943DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0761.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: AbstractThe present work investigates different responses of Arctic surface air temperature (SAT) to two ENSO types based on reanalysis datasets and model experiments. We find that eastern Pacific (EP) ENSO events are accompanied by statistically significant SAT responses over the Barents?Kara Seas in February, while central Pacific (CP) events coincide with statistically significant SAT responses over northeastern Canada and Greenland. These impacts are largely of opposite sign for ENSO warm and cold phases. During EP El Niño in February, the enhanced tropospheric polar vortex over Eurasia and associated local low-level northeasterly anomalies over the Barents?Kara Seas lead to anomalously cold SAT in this region. Simultaneously, the enhanced tropospheric polar vortex leads to enhanced sinking air motion and consequently reduced cloud cover. This in turn reduces downward infrared radiation (IR), which further reduces SAT in the Barents?Kara Seas region. Such a robust response cannot be detected during other winter months for EP ENSO events. During CP El Niño, the February SATs over northeastern Canada and Greenland are anomalously warm and coincide with a weakened tropospheric polar vortex and related local low-level southwesterly anomalies originating from the Atlantic Ocean. The anomalous warmth can be enhanced by the local positive feedback. Similar SAT signals as in February during CP ENSO events can also be seen in January, but they are less statistically robust. We demonstrate that these contrasting Arctic February SAT responses are consistent with responses to the two ENSO types with a series of atmospheric general circulation model experiments. These results have implications for the seasonal predictability of regional Arctic SAT anomalies.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Li, Zhiyu | |
contributor author | Zhang, Wenjun | |
contributor author | Stuecker, Malte F. | |
contributor author | Xu, Haiming | |
contributor author | Jin, Fei-Fei | |
contributor author | Liu, Chao | |
date accessioned | 2019-10-05T06:43:16Z | |
date available | 2019-10-05T06:43:16Z | |
date copyright | 5/13/2019 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier other | JCLI-D-18-0761.1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263212 | |
description abstract | AbstractThe present work investigates different responses of Arctic surface air temperature (SAT) to two ENSO types based on reanalysis datasets and model experiments. We find that eastern Pacific (EP) ENSO events are accompanied by statistically significant SAT responses over the Barents?Kara Seas in February, while central Pacific (CP) events coincide with statistically significant SAT responses over northeastern Canada and Greenland. These impacts are largely of opposite sign for ENSO warm and cold phases. During EP El Niño in February, the enhanced tropospheric polar vortex over Eurasia and associated local low-level northeasterly anomalies over the Barents?Kara Seas lead to anomalously cold SAT in this region. Simultaneously, the enhanced tropospheric polar vortex leads to enhanced sinking air motion and consequently reduced cloud cover. This in turn reduces downward infrared radiation (IR), which further reduces SAT in the Barents?Kara Seas region. Such a robust response cannot be detected during other winter months for EP ENSO events. During CP El Niño, the February SATs over northeastern Canada and Greenland are anomalously warm and coincide with a weakened tropospheric polar vortex and related local low-level southwesterly anomalies originating from the Atlantic Ocean. The anomalous warmth can be enhanced by the local positive feedback. Similar SAT signals as in February during CP ENSO events can also be seen in January, but they are less statistically robust. We demonstrate that these contrasting Arctic February SAT responses are consistent with responses to the two ENSO types with a series of atmospheric general circulation model experiments. These results have implications for the seasonal predictability of regional Arctic SAT anomalies. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Different Effects of Two ENSO Types on Arctic Surface Temperature in Boreal Winter | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 32 | |
journal issue | 16 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0761.1 | |
journal fristpage | 4943 | |
journal lastpage | 4961 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2019:;volume 032:;issue 016 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |