Observation-Based Source Terms in the Third-Generation Wave Model WAVEWATCH III: Updates and VerificationSource: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2018:;volume 049:;issue 002::page 489Author:Liu, Qingxiang
,
Rogers, W. Erick
,
Babanin, Alexander V.
,
Young, Ian R.
,
Romero, Leonel
,
Zieger, Stefan
,
Qiao, Fangli
,
Guan, Changlong
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-18-0137.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The observation-based source terms available in the third-generation wave model WAVEWATCH III (i.e., the ST6 package for parameterizations of wind input, wave breaking, and swell dissipation terms) are recalibrated and verified against a series of academic and realistic simulations, including the fetch/duration-limited test, a Lake Michigan hindcast, and a 1-yr global hindcast. The updated ST6 not only performs well in predicting commonly used bulk wave parameters (e.g., significant wave height and wave period) but also yields a clearly improved estimation of high-frequency energy level (in terms of saturation spectrum and mean square slope). In the duration-limited test, we investigate the modeled wave spectrum in a detailed way by introducing spectral metrics for the tail and the peak of the omnidirectional wave spectrum and for the directionality of the two-dimensional frequency?direction spectrum. The omnidirectional frequency spectrum E(f) from the recalibrated ST6 shows a clear transition behavior from a power law of approximately f?4 to a power law of about f?5, comparable to previous field studies. Different solvers for nonlinear wave interactions are applied with ST6, including the Discrete Interaction Approximation (DIA), the more expensive Generalized Multiple DIA (GMD), and the very expensive exact solutions [using the Webb?Resio?Tracy method (WRT)]. The GMD-simulated E(f) is in excellent agreement with that from WRT. Nonetheless, we find the peak of E(f) modeled by the GMD and WRT appears too narrow. It is also shown that in the 1-yr global hindcast, the DIA-based model overestimates the low-frequency wave energy (wave period T > 16 s) by 90%. Such model errors are reduced significantly by the GMD to ~20%.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Liu, Qingxiang | |
| contributor author | Rogers, W. Erick | |
| contributor author | Babanin, Alexander V. | |
| contributor author | Young, Ian R. | |
| contributor author | Romero, Leonel | |
| contributor author | Zieger, Stefan | |
| contributor author | Qiao, Fangli | |
| contributor author | Guan, Changlong | |
| date accessioned | 2019-09-22T09:03:08Z | |
| date available | 2019-09-22T09:03:08Z | |
| date copyright | 12/10/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2018 | |
| identifier other | JPO-D-18-0137.1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262527 | |
| description abstract | The observation-based source terms available in the third-generation wave model WAVEWATCH III (i.e., the ST6 package for parameterizations of wind input, wave breaking, and swell dissipation terms) are recalibrated and verified against a series of academic and realistic simulations, including the fetch/duration-limited test, a Lake Michigan hindcast, and a 1-yr global hindcast. The updated ST6 not only performs well in predicting commonly used bulk wave parameters (e.g., significant wave height and wave period) but also yields a clearly improved estimation of high-frequency energy level (in terms of saturation spectrum and mean square slope). In the duration-limited test, we investigate the modeled wave spectrum in a detailed way by introducing spectral metrics for the tail and the peak of the omnidirectional wave spectrum and for the directionality of the two-dimensional frequency?direction spectrum. The omnidirectional frequency spectrum E(f) from the recalibrated ST6 shows a clear transition behavior from a power law of approximately f?4 to a power law of about f?5, comparable to previous field studies. Different solvers for nonlinear wave interactions are applied with ST6, including the Discrete Interaction Approximation (DIA), the more expensive Generalized Multiple DIA (GMD), and the very expensive exact solutions [using the Webb?Resio?Tracy method (WRT)]. The GMD-simulated E(f) is in excellent agreement with that from WRT. Nonetheless, we find the peak of E(f) modeled by the GMD and WRT appears too narrow. It is also shown that in the 1-yr global hindcast, the DIA-based model overestimates the low-frequency wave energy (wave period T > 16 s) by 90%. Such model errors are reduced significantly by the GMD to ~20%. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Observation-Based Source Terms in the Third-Generation Wave Model WAVEWATCH III: Updates and Verification | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 49 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Physical Oceanography | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JPO-D-18-0137.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 489 | |
| journal lastpage | 517 | |
| tree | Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2018:;volume 049:;issue 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |