YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Climate Model Assessment of Changes in Winter–Spring Streamflow Timing over North America

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2018:;volume 031:;issue 014::page 5581
    Author:
    Kam, Jonghun
    ,
    Knutson, Thomas R.
    ,
    Milly, P. C. D.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0813.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractOver regions where snowmelt runoff substantially contributes to winter?spring streamflows, warming can accelerate snowmelt and reduce dry-season streamflows. However, conclusive detection of changes and attribution to anthropogenic forcing is hindered by the brevity of observational records, model uncertainty, and uncertainty concerning internal variability. In this study, the detection/attribution of changes in midlatitude North American winter?spring streamflow timing is examined using nine global climate models under multiple forcing scenarios. Robustness across models, start/end dates for trends, and assumptions about internal variability are evaluated. Marginal evidence for an emerging detectable anthropogenic influence (according to four or five of nine models) is found in the north-central United States, where winter?spring streamflows have been starting earlier. Weaker indications of detectable anthropogenic influence (three of nine models) are found in the mountainous western United States/southwestern Canada and in the extreme northeastern United States/Canadian Maritimes. In the former region, a recent shift toward later streamflows has rendered the full-record trend toward earlier streamflows only marginally significant, with possible implications for previously published climate change detection findings for streamflow timing in this region. In the latter region, no forced model shows as large a shift toward earlier streamflow timing as the detectable observed shift. In other (including warm, snow free) regions, observed trends are typically not detectable, although in the U.S. central plains we find detectable delays in streamflow, which are inconsistent with forced model experiments.
    • Download: (2.862Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Climate Model Assessment of Changes in Winter–Spring Streamflow Timing over North America

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262378
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKam, Jonghun
    contributor authorKnutson, Thomas R.
    contributor authorMilly, P. C. D.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:10:33Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:10:33Z
    date copyright4/13/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier otherjcli-d-17-0813.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262378
    description abstractAbstractOver regions where snowmelt runoff substantially contributes to winter?spring streamflows, warming can accelerate snowmelt and reduce dry-season streamflows. However, conclusive detection of changes and attribution to anthropogenic forcing is hindered by the brevity of observational records, model uncertainty, and uncertainty concerning internal variability. In this study, the detection/attribution of changes in midlatitude North American winter?spring streamflow timing is examined using nine global climate models under multiple forcing scenarios. Robustness across models, start/end dates for trends, and assumptions about internal variability are evaluated. Marginal evidence for an emerging detectable anthropogenic influence (according to four or five of nine models) is found in the north-central United States, where winter?spring streamflows have been starting earlier. Weaker indications of detectable anthropogenic influence (three of nine models) are found in the mountainous western United States/southwestern Canada and in the extreme northeastern United States/Canadian Maritimes. In the former region, a recent shift toward later streamflows has rendered the full-record trend toward earlier streamflows only marginally significant, with possible implications for previously published climate change detection findings for streamflow timing in this region. In the latter region, no forced model shows as large a shift toward earlier streamflow timing as the detectable observed shift. In other (including warm, snow free) regions, observed trends are typically not detectable, although in the U.S. central plains we find detectable delays in streamflow, which are inconsistent with forced model experiments.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleClimate Model Assessment of Changes in Winter–Spring Streamflow Timing over North America
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue14
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0813.1
    journal fristpage5581
    journal lastpage5593
    treeJournal of Climate:;2018:;volume 031:;issue 014
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian