YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of MERRA-2 Land Surface Energy Flux Estimates

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2017:;volume 031:;issue 002::page 671
    Author:
    Draper, Clara S.
    ,
    Reichle, Rolf H.
    ,
    Koster, Randal D.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0121.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractIn the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) system the land is forced by replacing the model-generated precipitation with observed precipitation before it reaches the surface. This approach is motivated by the expectation that the resultant improvements in soil moisture will lead to improved land surface latent heating (LH). Here aspects of the MERRA-2 land surface energy budget and 2-m air temperatures are assessed. For global land annual averages, MERRA-2 appears to overestimate the LH (by 5 W m?2), the sensible heating (by 6 W m?2), and the downwelling shortwave radiation (by 14 W m?2) while underestimating the downwelling and upwelling (absolute) longwave radiation (by 10?15 W m?2 each). These results differ only slightly from those for NASA?s previous reanalysis, MERRA. Comparison to various gridded reference datasets over boreal summer (June?August) suggests that MERRA-2 has particularly large positive biases (>20 W m?2) where LH is energy limited and that these biases are associated with evaporative fraction biases rather than radiation biases. For time series of monthly means during boreal summer, the globally averaged anomaly correlations with reference data were improved from MERRA to MERRA-2, for LH (from 0.39 to 0.48 vs Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model data) and the daily maximum T2m (from 0.69 to 0.75 vs Climatic Research Unit data). In regions where is particularly sensitive to the precipitation corrections (including the central United States, the Sahel, and parts of South Asia), the changes in the are relatively large, suggesting that the observed precipitation influenced the performance.
    • Download: (4.799Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessment of MERRA-2 Land Surface Energy Flux Estimates

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261991
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDraper, Clara S.
    contributor authorReichle, Rolf H.
    contributor authorKoster, Randal D.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:08:29Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:08:29Z
    date copyright10/26/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2017
    identifier otherjcli-d-17-0121.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261991
    description abstractAbstractIn the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) system the land is forced by replacing the model-generated precipitation with observed precipitation before it reaches the surface. This approach is motivated by the expectation that the resultant improvements in soil moisture will lead to improved land surface latent heating (LH). Here aspects of the MERRA-2 land surface energy budget and 2-m air temperatures are assessed. For global land annual averages, MERRA-2 appears to overestimate the LH (by 5 W m?2), the sensible heating (by 6 W m?2), and the downwelling shortwave radiation (by 14 W m?2) while underestimating the downwelling and upwelling (absolute) longwave radiation (by 10?15 W m?2 each). These results differ only slightly from those for NASA?s previous reanalysis, MERRA. Comparison to various gridded reference datasets over boreal summer (June?August) suggests that MERRA-2 has particularly large positive biases (>20 W m?2) where LH is energy limited and that these biases are associated with evaporative fraction biases rather than radiation biases. For time series of monthly means during boreal summer, the globally averaged anomaly correlations with reference data were improved from MERRA to MERRA-2, for LH (from 0.39 to 0.48 vs Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model data) and the daily maximum T2m (from 0.69 to 0.75 vs Climatic Research Unit data). In regions where is particularly sensitive to the precipitation corrections (including the central United States, the Sahel, and parts of South Asia), the changes in the are relatively large, suggesting that the observed precipitation influenced the performance.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAssessment of MERRA-2 Land Surface Energy Flux Estimates
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0121.1
    journal fristpage671
    journal lastpage691
    treeJournal of Climate:;2017:;volume 031:;issue 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian