YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore Wind Energy Can Point the Way

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2017:;volume 099:;issue 006::page 1155
    Author:
    Banta, Robert M.
    ,
    Pichugina, Yelena L.
    ,
    Brewer, W. Alan
    ,
    James, Eric P.
    ,
    Olson, Joseph B.
    ,
    Benjamin, Stanley G.
    ,
    Carley, Jacob R.
    ,
    Bianco, Laura
    ,
    Djalalova, Irina V.
    ,
    Wilczak, James M.
    ,
    Hardesty, R. Michael
    ,
    Cline, Joel
    ,
    Marquis, Melinda C.
    DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0310.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractTo advance the understanding of meteorological processes in offshore coastal regions, the spatial variability of wind profiles must be characterized and uncertainties (errors) in NWP model wind forecasts quantified. These gaps are especially critical for the new offshore wind energy industry, where wind profile measurements in the marine atmospheric layer spanned by wind turbine rotor blades, generally 50?200 m above mean sea level (MSL), have been largely unavailable. Here, high-quality wind profile measurements were available every 15 min from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL)?s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) during a monthlong research cruise in the Gulf of Maine for the 2004 New England Air Quality Study. These measurements were compared with retrospective NWP model wind forecasts over the area using two NOAA forecast-modeling systems [North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) and Rapid Refresh (RAP)]. HRDL profile measurements quantified model errors, including their dependence on height above sea level, diurnal cycle, and forecast lead time. Typical model wind speed errors were ?2.5 m s?1, and vector-wind errors were ?4 m s?1. Short-term forecast errors were larger near the surface?30% larger below 100 m than above and largest for several hours after local midnight (biased low). Longer-term, 12-h forecasts had the largest errors after local sunset (biased high). At more than 3-h lead times, predictions from finer-resolution models exhibited larger errors. Horizontal variability of winds, measured as the ship traversed the Gulf of Maine, was significant and raised questions about whether modeled fields, which appeared smooth in comparison, were capturing this variability. If not, horizontal arrays of high-quality, vertical-profiling devices will be required for wind energy resource assessment offshore. Such measurement arrays are also needed to improve NWP models.
    • Download: (11.05Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore Wind Energy Can Point the Way

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261883
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBanta, Robert M.
    contributor authorPichugina, Yelena L.
    contributor authorBrewer, W. Alan
    contributor authorJames, Eric P.
    contributor authorOlson, Joseph B.
    contributor authorBenjamin, Stanley G.
    contributor authorCarley, Jacob R.
    contributor authorBianco, Laura
    contributor authorDjalalova, Irina V.
    contributor authorWilczak, James M.
    contributor authorHardesty, R. Michael
    contributor authorCline, Joel
    contributor authorMarquis, Melinda C.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:07:56Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:07:56Z
    date copyright12/21/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2017
    identifier otherbams-d-16-0310.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261883
    description abstractAbstractTo advance the understanding of meteorological processes in offshore coastal regions, the spatial variability of wind profiles must be characterized and uncertainties (errors) in NWP model wind forecasts quantified. These gaps are especially critical for the new offshore wind energy industry, where wind profile measurements in the marine atmospheric layer spanned by wind turbine rotor blades, generally 50?200 m above mean sea level (MSL), have been largely unavailable. Here, high-quality wind profile measurements were available every 15 min from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL)?s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) during a monthlong research cruise in the Gulf of Maine for the 2004 New England Air Quality Study. These measurements were compared with retrospective NWP model wind forecasts over the area using two NOAA forecast-modeling systems [North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) and Rapid Refresh (RAP)]. HRDL profile measurements quantified model errors, including their dependence on height above sea level, diurnal cycle, and forecast lead time. Typical model wind speed errors were ?2.5 m s?1, and vector-wind errors were ?4 m s?1. Short-term forecast errors were larger near the surface?30% larger below 100 m than above and largest for several hours after local midnight (biased low). Longer-term, 12-h forecasts had the largest errors after local sunset (biased high). At more than 3-h lead times, predictions from finer-resolution models exhibited larger errors. Horizontal variability of winds, measured as the ship traversed the Gulf of Maine, was significant and raised questions about whether modeled fields, which appeared smooth in comparison, were capturing this variability. If not, horizontal arrays of high-quality, vertical-profiling devices will be required for wind energy resource assessment offshore. Such measurement arrays are also needed to improve NWP models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore Wind Energy Can Point the Way
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume99
    journal issue6
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0310.1
    journal fristpage1155
    journal lastpage1176
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2017:;volume 099:;issue 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian