YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE) in the 2016 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiment

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2018:;volume 099:;issue 007::page 1433
    Author:
    Clark, Adam J.
    ,
    Jirak, Israel L.
    ,
    Dembek, Scott R.
    ,
    Creager, Gerry J.
    ,
    Kong, Fanyou
    ,
    Thomas, Kevin W.
    ,
    Knopfmeier, Kent H.
    ,
    Gallo, Burkely T.
    ,
    Melick, Christopher J.
    ,
    Xue, Ming
    ,
    Brewster, Keith A.
    ,
    Jung, Youngsun
    ,
    Kennedy, Aaron
    ,
    Dong, Xiquan
    ,
    Markel, Joshua
    ,
    Gilmore, Matthew
    ,
    Romine, Glen S.
    ,
    Fossell, Kathryn R.
    ,
    Sobash, Ryan A.
    ,
    Carley, Jacob R.
    ,
    Ferrier, Brad S.
    ,
    Pyle, Matthew
    ,
    Alexander, Curtis R.
    ,
    Weiss, Steven J.
    ,
    Kain, John S.
    ,
    Wicker, Louis J.
    ,
    Thompson, Gregory
    ,
    Adams-Selin, Rebecca D.
    ,
    Imy, David A.
    DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0309.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractOne primary goal of annual Spring Forecasting Experiments (SFEs), which are coorganized by NOAA?s National Severe Storms Laboratory and Storm Prediction Center and conducted in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration?s (NOAA) Hazardous Weather Testbed, is documenting performance characteristics of experimental, convection-allowing modeling systems (CAMs). Since 2007, the number of CAMs (including CAM ensembles) examined in the SFEs has increased dramatically, peaking at six different CAM ensembles in 2015. Meanwhile, major advances have been made in creating, importing, processing, verifying, and developing tools for analyzing and visualizing these large and complex datasets. However, progress toward identifying optimal CAM ensemble configurations has been inhibited because the different CAM systems have been independently designed, making it difficult to attribute differences in performance characteristics. Thus, for the 2016 SFE, a much more coordinated effort among many collaborators was made by agreeing on a set of model specifications (e.g., model version, grid spacing, domain size, and physics) so that the simulations contributed by each collaborator could be combined to form one large, carefully designed ensemble known as the Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE). The 2016 CLUE was composed of 65 members contributed by five research institutions and represents an unprecedented effort to enable an evidence-driven decision process to help guide NOAA?s operational modeling efforts. Eight unique experiments were designed within the CLUE framework to examine issues directly relevant to the design of NOAA?s future operational CAM-based ensembles. This article will highlight the CLUE design and present results from one of the experiments examining the impact of single versus multicore CAM ensemble configurations.
    • Download: (1.289Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE) in the 2016 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiment

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261872
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorClark, Adam J.
    contributor authorJirak, Israel L.
    contributor authorDembek, Scott R.
    contributor authorCreager, Gerry J.
    contributor authorKong, Fanyou
    contributor authorThomas, Kevin W.
    contributor authorKnopfmeier, Kent H.
    contributor authorGallo, Burkely T.
    contributor authorMelick, Christopher J.
    contributor authorXue, Ming
    contributor authorBrewster, Keith A.
    contributor authorJung, Youngsun
    contributor authorKennedy, Aaron
    contributor authorDong, Xiquan
    contributor authorMarkel, Joshua
    contributor authorGilmore, Matthew
    contributor authorRomine, Glen S.
    contributor authorFossell, Kathryn R.
    contributor authorSobash, Ryan A.
    contributor authorCarley, Jacob R.
    contributor authorFerrier, Brad S.
    contributor authorPyle, Matthew
    contributor authorAlexander, Curtis R.
    contributor authorWeiss, Steven J.
    contributor authorKain, John S.
    contributor authorWicker, Louis J.
    contributor authorThompson, Gregory
    contributor authorAdams-Selin, Rebecca D.
    contributor authorImy, David A.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:07:52Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:07:52Z
    date copyright1/15/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier otherbams-d-16-0309.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261872
    description abstractAbstractOne primary goal of annual Spring Forecasting Experiments (SFEs), which are coorganized by NOAA?s National Severe Storms Laboratory and Storm Prediction Center and conducted in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration?s (NOAA) Hazardous Weather Testbed, is documenting performance characteristics of experimental, convection-allowing modeling systems (CAMs). Since 2007, the number of CAMs (including CAM ensembles) examined in the SFEs has increased dramatically, peaking at six different CAM ensembles in 2015. Meanwhile, major advances have been made in creating, importing, processing, verifying, and developing tools for analyzing and visualizing these large and complex datasets. However, progress toward identifying optimal CAM ensemble configurations has been inhibited because the different CAM systems have been independently designed, making it difficult to attribute differences in performance characteristics. Thus, for the 2016 SFE, a much more coordinated effort among many collaborators was made by agreeing on a set of model specifications (e.g., model version, grid spacing, domain size, and physics) so that the simulations contributed by each collaborator could be combined to form one large, carefully designed ensemble known as the Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE). The 2016 CLUE was composed of 65 members contributed by five research institutions and represents an unprecedented effort to enable an evidence-driven decision process to help guide NOAA?s operational modeling efforts. Eight unique experiments were designed within the CLUE framework to examine issues directly relevant to the design of NOAA?s future operational CAM-based ensembles. This article will highlight the CLUE design and present results from one of the experiments examining the impact of single versus multicore CAM ensemble configurations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE) in the 2016 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume99
    journal issue7
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0309.1
    journal fristpage1433
    journal lastpage1448
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2018:;volume 099:;issue 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian