YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Testing the Sensitivity of the Extratropical Response to the Location, Amplitude, and Propagation Speed of Tropical Convection

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;volume 075:;issue 002::page 639
    Author:
    Goss, Michael
    ,
    Feldstein, Steven B.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0132.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractThe dynamical core of a dry global model is used to investigate the role of central Pacific versus warm pool tropical convection on the extratropical response over the North Pacific and North America. A series of model runs is performed in which the amplitude of the warm pool (WP) and central Pacific (CP) heating anomalies associated with the MJO and El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is systematically varied. In addition, model calculations based on each of the eight MJO phases are performed, first using stationary heating, and then with heating corresponding to a 48-day MJO cycle and to a 32-day MJO cycle.In all model runs, the extratropical response to tropical convection occurs within 7?10 days of the convective heating. The response is very sensitive to the relative amplitude of the heating anomalies. For example, when heating anomalies in the WP and CP have similar amplitude but opposite sign, the amplitude of the extratropical response is much weaker than is typical for the MJO and ENSO. For the MJO, when the WP heating anomaly is much stronger than the CP heating anomaly (vice versa for ENSO), the extratropical response is amplified. For the MJO heating, it is found that the extratropical responses to phases 4 and 8 are most distinct. A likely factor contributing to this distinctiveness involves the relative amplitude of the two heating anomalies. The stationary and moving (48- and 32-day) heating responses are very similar, revealing a lack of sensitivity to the MJO phase speed.
    • Download: (5.180Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Testing the Sensitivity of the Extratropical Response to the Location, Amplitude, and Propagation Speed of Tropical Convection

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261743
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGoss, Michael
    contributor authorFeldstein, Steven B.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:07:12Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:07:12Z
    date copyright12/12/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2017
    identifier otherjas-d-17-0132.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261743
    description abstractAbstractThe dynamical core of a dry global model is used to investigate the role of central Pacific versus warm pool tropical convection on the extratropical response over the North Pacific and North America. A series of model runs is performed in which the amplitude of the warm pool (WP) and central Pacific (CP) heating anomalies associated with the MJO and El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is systematically varied. In addition, model calculations based on each of the eight MJO phases are performed, first using stationary heating, and then with heating corresponding to a 48-day MJO cycle and to a 32-day MJO cycle.In all model runs, the extratropical response to tropical convection occurs within 7?10 days of the convective heating. The response is very sensitive to the relative amplitude of the heating anomalies. For example, when heating anomalies in the WP and CP have similar amplitude but opposite sign, the amplitude of the extratropical response is much weaker than is typical for the MJO and ENSO. For the MJO, when the WP heating anomaly is much stronger than the CP heating anomaly (vice versa for ENSO), the extratropical response is amplified. For the MJO heating, it is found that the extratropical responses to phases 4 and 8 are most distinct. A likely factor contributing to this distinctiveness involves the relative amplitude of the two heating anomalies. The stationary and moving (48- and 32-day) heating responses are very similar, revealing a lack of sensitivity to the MJO phase speed.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleTesting the Sensitivity of the Extratropical Response to the Location, Amplitude, and Propagation Speed of Tropical Convection
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume75
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-17-0132.1
    journal fristpage639
    journal lastpage655
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;volume 075:;issue 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian