Generation of Inflow Turbulence in Large-Eddy Simulations of Nonneutral Atmospheric Boundary Layers with the Cell Perturbation MethodSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2018:;volume 146:;issue 006::page 1889DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0077.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: AbstractRealistic multiscale simulations involve coupling of mesoscale and large-eddy simulation (LES) models, thus requiring efficient generation of turbulence in nested LES domains. Herein, we extend our previous work on the cell perturbation (CP) method to nonneutral atmospheric boundary layers (ABLs). A modified Richardson number scaling is proposed to determine the amplitude of the potential temperature perturbations in stable ABLs, with ?1.0 overall providing optimum turbulence transition to a fully developed state (fetch reduced by a factor of 4?5, compared to the unperturbed cases). In the absence of perturbations, turbulence onset is triggered by a Kelvin?Helmholtz instability, typically occurring in the vicinity of the low-level jet maximum. It is found that a turbulent length scale can be used to more accurately estimate the optimum , where q is the turbulence kinetic energy, and N is the Brunt?Väisälä frequency. In convective ABLs, a perturbation amplitude based on mixed layer temperature variance scaling is proposed: . For that criterion to be optimum, the ratio , where is the wind speed at the top of the capping inversion, and is the convective velocity scale, needs to be incorporated: . This allows us to account for the competing roles of the surface thermal instability and the mean flow advection. For 10, the development fetch is reduced by a factor of 6, while when 3, the use of the CP method does not provide a significant advantage in the ability to generate turbulence, provided a smooth mesoscale inflow.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Muñoz-Esparza, Domingo | |
contributor author | Kosović, Branko | |
date accessioned | 2019-09-19T10:04:59Z | |
date available | 2019-09-19T10:04:59Z | |
date copyright | 5/4/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2018 | |
identifier other | mwr-d-18-0077.1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261329 | |
description abstract | AbstractRealistic multiscale simulations involve coupling of mesoscale and large-eddy simulation (LES) models, thus requiring efficient generation of turbulence in nested LES domains. Herein, we extend our previous work on the cell perturbation (CP) method to nonneutral atmospheric boundary layers (ABLs). A modified Richardson number scaling is proposed to determine the amplitude of the potential temperature perturbations in stable ABLs, with ?1.0 overall providing optimum turbulence transition to a fully developed state (fetch reduced by a factor of 4?5, compared to the unperturbed cases). In the absence of perturbations, turbulence onset is triggered by a Kelvin?Helmholtz instability, typically occurring in the vicinity of the low-level jet maximum. It is found that a turbulent length scale can be used to more accurately estimate the optimum , where q is the turbulence kinetic energy, and N is the Brunt?Väisälä frequency. In convective ABLs, a perturbation amplitude based on mixed layer temperature variance scaling is proposed: . For that criterion to be optimum, the ratio , where is the wind speed at the top of the capping inversion, and is the convective velocity scale, needs to be incorporated: . This allows us to account for the competing roles of the surface thermal instability and the mean flow advection. For 10, the development fetch is reduced by a factor of 6, while when 3, the use of the CP method does not provide a significant advantage in the ability to generate turbulence, provided a smooth mesoscale inflow. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Generation of Inflow Turbulence in Large-Eddy Simulations of Nonneutral Atmospheric Boundary Layers with the Cell Perturbation Method | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 146 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0077.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1889 | |
journal lastpage | 1909 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2018:;volume 146:;issue 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |