YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Bias Correction of Historical and Future Simulations of Precipitation and Temperature for China from CMIP5 Models

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2018:;volume 019:;issue 003::page 609
    Author:
    Yang, X.
    ,
    Wood, E. F.
    ,
    Sheffield, J.
    ,
    Ren, L.
    ,
    Zhang, M.
    ,
    Wang, Y.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0180.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: ABSTRACTIn this study, the equidistant cumulative distribution function (EDCDF) quantile-based mapping method was used to develop bias-corrected and downscaled monthly precipitation and temperature for China at 0.5° ? 0.5° spatial resolution for the period 1961?2099 for eight CMIP5 GCM simulations. The downscaled dataset was constructed by combining observations from 756 meteorological stations across China with the monthly GCM outputs for the historical (1961?2005) and future (2006?99) periods for the lower (RCP2.6), medium (RCP4.5), and high (RCP8.5) representative concentration pathway emission scenarios. The jackknife method was used to cross validate the performance of the EDCDF method and was compared with the traditional quantile-based matching method (CDF method). This indicated that the performance of the two methods was generally comparable over the historic period, but the EDCDF was more efficient at reducing biases than the CDF method across China. The two methods had similar mean absolute error (MAE) for temperature in January and July. The EDCDF method had a slight advantage over the CDF method for precipitation, reducing the MAE by about 0.83% and 1.2% at a significance level of 95% in January and July, respectively. For future projections, both methods exhibited similar spatial patterns for longer periods (2061?90) under the RCP8.5 scenario. However, the EDCDF was more sensitive to a reduction in variability.
    • Download: (3.212Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Bias Correction of Historical and Future Simulations of Precipitation and Temperature for China from CMIP5 Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260791
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYang, X.
    contributor authorWood, E. F.
    contributor authorSheffield, J.
    contributor authorRen, L.
    contributor authorZhang, M.
    contributor authorWang, Y.
    date accessioned2019-09-19T10:01:58Z
    date available2019-09-19T10:01:58Z
    date copyright3/1/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier otherjhm-d-17-0180.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260791
    description abstractABSTRACTIn this study, the equidistant cumulative distribution function (EDCDF) quantile-based mapping method was used to develop bias-corrected and downscaled monthly precipitation and temperature for China at 0.5° ? 0.5° spatial resolution for the period 1961?2099 for eight CMIP5 GCM simulations. The downscaled dataset was constructed by combining observations from 756 meteorological stations across China with the monthly GCM outputs for the historical (1961?2005) and future (2006?99) periods for the lower (RCP2.6), medium (RCP4.5), and high (RCP8.5) representative concentration pathway emission scenarios. The jackknife method was used to cross validate the performance of the EDCDF method and was compared with the traditional quantile-based matching method (CDF method). This indicated that the performance of the two methods was generally comparable over the historic period, but the EDCDF was more efficient at reducing biases than the CDF method across China. The two methods had similar mean absolute error (MAE) for temperature in January and July. The EDCDF method had a slight advantage over the CDF method for precipitation, reducing the MAE by about 0.83% and 1.2% at a significance level of 95% in January and July, respectively. For future projections, both methods exhibited similar spatial patterns for longer periods (2061?90) under the RCP8.5 scenario. However, the EDCDF was more sensitive to a reduction in variability.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleBias Correction of Historical and Future Simulations of Precipitation and Temperature for China from CMIP5 Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-17-0180.1
    journal fristpage609
    journal lastpage623
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2018:;volume 019:;issue 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian