Assessing Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor Performance for Flood Forecasting in a Semiurban WatershedSource: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 009DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001828Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: A key challenge in enhancing flood forecast relies in the difficulty of reducing predictive uncertainty. The precipitation-dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor (HUP) is a flexible model independent Bayesian processor that can be used with any hydrologic model to provide probabilistic forecast. This study investigates the use of HUP with different hydrologic models for hydrologic uncertainty quantification in a flood forecasting scheme for a semiurban watershed of southern Ontario, Canada. The purpose is to better understand predictive uncertainty and enhance flood forecasting system reliability in semiurban conditions. HUP is based on Bayes’ theorem, and it updates the prior distribution given available information at the forecast time to obtain the posterior distribution that is close to future unknown actual value. In this study, the hydrological model (HYMOD) and the modèle du Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Horaire (GR4H) were selected to work with HUP, and the Bayesian processor was calibrated using a number of selected flood events from 2005 to 2014. The performance of the processor was assessed by graphical tools and performance metrics, like reliability plots, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). Results show that HUP provides a robust framework and a reliable analytic-numerical method for the quantification of hydrologic uncertainty, the actual values are well captured by the uncertainty bounds, the CRPS values are relatively small, and reliability curves lie close to the bisector. The comparison between the NSE calculated from the output of the sole deterministic hydrologic model (HYMOD/GR4H) and from the median of the predictive distribution produced by HUP-HYMOD/HUP-GR4H, demonstrates that HUP has the ability to improve the deterministic forecast. For low peak flow events, HUP combining with different hydrologic models presents similar predictive performance, while for high peak flow events, a well performed deterministic model is required in HUP to produce an accurate probabilistic forecast.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Shasha Han | |
contributor author | Paulin Coulibaly | |
contributor author | Daniela Biondi | |
date accessioned | 2019-09-18T10:42:29Z | |
date available | 2019-09-18T10:42:29Z | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier other | %28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001828.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260539 | |
description abstract | A key challenge in enhancing flood forecast relies in the difficulty of reducing predictive uncertainty. The precipitation-dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor (HUP) is a flexible model independent Bayesian processor that can be used with any hydrologic model to provide probabilistic forecast. This study investigates the use of HUP with different hydrologic models for hydrologic uncertainty quantification in a flood forecasting scheme for a semiurban watershed of southern Ontario, Canada. The purpose is to better understand predictive uncertainty and enhance flood forecasting system reliability in semiurban conditions. HUP is based on Bayes’ theorem, and it updates the prior distribution given available information at the forecast time to obtain the posterior distribution that is close to future unknown actual value. In this study, the hydrological model (HYMOD) and the modèle du Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Horaire (GR4H) were selected to work with HUP, and the Bayesian processor was calibrated using a number of selected flood events from 2005 to 2014. The performance of the processor was assessed by graphical tools and performance metrics, like reliability plots, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). Results show that HUP provides a robust framework and a reliable analytic-numerical method for the quantification of hydrologic uncertainty, the actual values are well captured by the uncertainty bounds, the CRPS values are relatively small, and reliability curves lie close to the bisector. The comparison between the NSE calculated from the output of the sole deterministic hydrologic model (HYMOD/GR4H) and from the median of the predictive distribution produced by HUP-HYMOD/HUP-GR4H, demonstrates that HUP has the ability to improve the deterministic forecast. For low peak flow events, HUP combining with different hydrologic models presents similar predictive performance, while for high peak flow events, a well performed deterministic model is required in HUP to produce an accurate probabilistic forecast. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Assessing Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor Performance for Flood Forecasting in a Semiurban Watershed | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 24 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001828 | |
page | 05019025 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |