YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Determination of Equivalent Roughness of Bridge Piers’ Flow Resistance

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Xing Yang
    ,
    Jun Qian
    ,
    Songgan Weng
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001816
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The Manning equation has been widely used in rivers, with the flow resistance caused by bed roughness (n) to account for all energy loss influences associated with channel characteristics. Flow resistance also arises from bridge piers, which are common features in rivers, but the Manning equation is inappropriate for estimating overall flow resistance caused by the drag force on bridge piers. Therefore, it is necessary to study the relationship between flow resistance and bridge pier parameters, especially when a large number of bridge piers are present in rivers. Two new methods are proposed, in which the alternative and equivalent roughness nt is related to bridge pier characteristics and can incorporate bed roughness n. The first method (namely measured data–based method) is derived from the analysis of local head loss and frictional head loss and can be used in the case of field-measured data. The second method (namely, the multiparameter empirical method) is derived from the drag coefficient of a single pier, the spatial distribution form of the piers, and the difference of the incoming flow velocities and can be used practically without a comprehensive field site data survey. The calculation of the equivalent roughness of 30 bridges in Jiangsu shows that the results from two methods are in good agreement with each other. The two methods developed in this study provide conveniences for assessing the flow resistance caused by pier drag forces.
    • Download: (829.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Determination of Equivalent Roughness of Bridge Piers’ Flow Resistance

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260530
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorXing Yang
    contributor authorJun Qian
    contributor authorSonggan Weng
    date accessioned2019-09-18T10:42:27Z
    date available2019-09-18T10:42:27Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001816.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260530
    description abstractThe Manning equation has been widely used in rivers, with the flow resistance caused by bed roughness (n) to account for all energy loss influences associated with channel characteristics. Flow resistance also arises from bridge piers, which are common features in rivers, but the Manning equation is inappropriate for estimating overall flow resistance caused by the drag force on bridge piers. Therefore, it is necessary to study the relationship between flow resistance and bridge pier parameters, especially when a large number of bridge piers are present in rivers. Two new methods are proposed, in which the alternative and equivalent roughness nt is related to bridge pier characteristics and can incorporate bed roughness n. The first method (namely measured data–based method) is derived from the analysis of local head loss and frictional head loss and can be used in the case of field-measured data. The second method (namely, the multiparameter empirical method) is derived from the drag coefficient of a single pier, the spatial distribution form of the piers, and the difference of the incoming flow velocities and can be used practically without a comprehensive field site data survey. The calculation of the equivalent roughness of 30 bridges in Jiangsu shows that the results from two methods are in good agreement with each other. The two methods developed in this study provide conveniences for assessing the flow resistance caused by pier drag forces.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDetermination of Equivalent Roughness of Bridge Piers’ Flow Resistance
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001816
    page04019024
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian