Show simple item record

contributor authorModi, Nishant
contributor authorPandya, Bhargav
contributor authorPatel, Jatin
contributor authorMudgal, Anurag
date accessioned2019-09-18T09:06:56Z
date available2019-09-18T09:06:56Z
date copyright4/4/2019 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier issn0195-0738
identifier otherjert_141_9_092002
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4259028
description abstractThe present study compares the thermal performance of various alternative refrigerants with conventional refrigerant operating on a vapor compression cycle with energetic, exergetic, and advanced exergetic approaches. Appropriate alternative refrigerants are selected for the analysis, and R1234yf is recommended as the best suitable refrigerant to replace the existing refrigerants. By splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and unavoidable, endogenous and avoidable, exogenous and unavoidable, and exogenous and avoidable parts, an advanced exergy method depicts the real potentials for the improvement in the thermal system. Moreover, a traditional exergy method prefers condenser for performance improvement as it has 18.48% higher exergy destruction than evaporator, whereas the advanced exergy method proposes evaporator rather than condenser since its endogenous and avoidable destruction part is 26.38% more than condenser for R1234yf refrigerant.
publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAdvanced Exergetic Assessment of a Vapor Compression Cycle With Alternative Refrigerants
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4043249
journal fristpage92002
journal lastpage092002-9
treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2019:;volume 141:;issue 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record