Show simple item record

contributor authorShin, Hyunho
contributor authorLee, Jae-Ha
contributor authorKim, Jong-Bong
contributor authorSeo, Seung-Jae
contributor authorLee, Jaekun
contributor authorLee, Jong-Oek
contributor authorYoon, Tae-Sik
contributor authorJeong, Chanseok
date accessioned2019-09-18T09:03:20Z
date available2019-09-18T09:03:20Z
date copyright7/17/2019 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_141_10_101401
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4258326
description abstractThree types of surfaces in the Schroeder–Webster (SW) theory, i.e., sliding, mixed, and sticking surfaces, have been verified via finite element analysis of an axisymmetric compression test for a metallic specimen. Judging from (i) the radial profile of the pressure at the top elements and (ii) the radial displacement at the top nodes, the three types of SW surfaces are not manifested in the numerical simulation. However, the SW friction compensation model developed for the SW-sliding surface is remarkably reliable in predicting the measured stress–strain curve of the barreled specimen down to the height-to-diameter ratio of 0.1. The origin of this reliability is discussed along with recommendations for using the SW friction compensation model for the SW-sliding surface.
publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNumerical Verification of the Schroeder–Webster Surface Types and Friction Compensation Models for a Metallic Specimen in Axisymmetric Compression Test
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4044131
journal fristpage101401
journal lastpage101401-12
treeJournal of Tribology:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record