YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rehabilitation of Longitudinal Joints in Double-Tee Girder Bridges

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2019:;Volume (024):;issue:006
    Author:
    Mostafa Tazarv;Lucas Bohn;Nadim Wehbe
    DOI: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001412
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Precast prestressed double-tee girder bridges are common on county bridges in South Dakota. However, the longitudinal joints of these bridges are rapidly deteriorating, causing girder replacement after only 45 years of service. The present study was conducted to develop, construct, and evaluate rehabilitation methods for the longitudinal joint of double-tee bridges. Twenty joint rehabilitation detailing alternatives are proposed and ranked in the present study. Thirteen large-scale beams were tested to investigate the performance of the best four rehabilitation details. Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) and latex modified concrete (LMC) were selected as the filler materials. Subsequently, two joint concepts, “pocket” and “continuous,” were developed based on the experimental and analytical studies. A full-scale 12.19-m (40-ft) long double-tee girder bridge was constructed using conventional longitudinal joint detailing and was tested under fatigue loads. Subsequently, the bridge was rehabilitated using the two proposed details and was tested under fatigue and strength loading. No significant damage, beyond initial shrinkage cracks in LMC, was observed throughout the fatigue testing. Furthermore, the stiffness of the bridge did not degrade. No significant damage or yielding of the reinforcement in the rehabilitated joints was observed throughout the strength testing. Overall, the rehabilitated bridge met all current code requirements indicating sufficient structural performance. The rehabilitation cost of a double-tee bridge with pocket detailing is expected to be less than 30% of the bridge superstructure replacement cost.
    • Download: (5.160Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rehabilitation of Longitudinal Joints in Double-Tee Girder Bridges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257319
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMostafa Tazarv;Lucas Bohn;Nadim Wehbe
    date accessioned2019-06-08T07:25:50Z
    date available2019-06-08T07:25:50Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001412.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257319
    description abstractPrecast prestressed double-tee girder bridges are common on county bridges in South Dakota. However, the longitudinal joints of these bridges are rapidly deteriorating, causing girder replacement after only 45 years of service. The present study was conducted to develop, construct, and evaluate rehabilitation methods for the longitudinal joint of double-tee bridges. Twenty joint rehabilitation detailing alternatives are proposed and ranked in the present study. Thirteen large-scale beams were tested to investigate the performance of the best four rehabilitation details. Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) and latex modified concrete (LMC) were selected as the filler materials. Subsequently, two joint concepts, “pocket” and “continuous,” were developed based on the experimental and analytical studies. A full-scale 12.19-m (40-ft) long double-tee girder bridge was constructed using conventional longitudinal joint detailing and was tested under fatigue loads. Subsequently, the bridge was rehabilitated using the two proposed details and was tested under fatigue and strength loading. No significant damage, beyond initial shrinkage cracks in LMC, was observed throughout the fatigue testing. Furthermore, the stiffness of the bridge did not degrade. No significant damage or yielding of the reinforcement in the rehabilitated joints was observed throughout the strength testing. Overall, the rehabilitated bridge met all current code requirements indicating sufficient structural performance. The rehabilitation cost of a double-tee bridge with pocket detailing is expected to be less than 30% of the bridge superstructure replacement cost.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRehabilitation of Longitudinal Joints in Double-Tee Girder Bridges
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume24
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doidoi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001412
    page04019044
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2019:;Volume (024):;issue:006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian