Show simple item record

contributor authorZhang, Qianqian
contributor authorGao, Shanshan
contributor authorLiu, Chunxu
contributor authorLu, Yuqing
contributor authorChen, Xin
contributor authorYu, Haiyang
date accessioned2019-03-17T10:44:16Z
date available2019-03-17T10:44:16Z
date copyright11/1/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_141_03_031601.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256287
description abstractThe mechanical properties of crystalline phase of glass ceramics are critical. This study aimed to evaluate wear resistance of different crystalline-reinforced dental chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) glass ceramics. Materials of feldspar (Vita Mark II, VM), leucite (IPS Empress CAD, EC), lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, EX), lithium disilicate enriched with zirconia (Vita Suprinity, VS), and enamel were embedded, grounded, and polished, respectively. Samples were indented with a Vickers hardness tester to test the fracture resistance (KIC). Two-body wear tests were performed in a reciprocal ball-on-flat configuration under artificial saliva. The parameters of load force (50 N), reciprocating amplitude (500 μm), frequency (2 Hz), and the test cycle (10,000 cycles) were selected. Specimen microstructure, indentation morphology, and wear scars were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), optical microscopy, and three-dimensional profile microscopy. EX, VS, and EC demonstrated significantly higher KIC values than the enamel, while ceramic materials showed smaller wear depth results. Cracks, massive delamination, and shallow plow were seen on the enamel worn scar. Long deep plow, delamination, and brittle cracks are more common for VM and EC, and short shallow plow and smooth subsurface are the characteristics of EX and VS. Greater fracture toughness values indicated higher wear resistances of the materials for the test glass ceramics. The CAD/CAM glass ceramics performed greater wear resistance than enamel. Feldspar- and leucite-reinforced glass ceramics illustrated better wear resistance similar to enamel than lithium disilicate glass ceramics, providing amicable matching with the opposite teeth.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEvaluation of Wear Resistance of Dental Chairside CAD/CAM Glass Ceramics Reinforced by Different Crystalline Phases
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4041536
journal fristpage31601
journal lastpage031601-9
treeJournal of Tribology:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record