| description abstract | The current industrial standard for numerical simulations of axial compressors is the steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach. Besides the well-known limitations of mixing planes, namely their inherent inability to capture the potential interaction and the wakes from the upstream blades, there is another flow feature which is lost, and which is a major accountable for the radial mixing: the transport of streamwise vorticity. Streamwise vorticity is generated for various reasons, mainly associated with secondary and tip-clearance flows. A strong link exists between the strain field associated with the vortices and the mixing augmentation: the strain field increases both the area available for mixing and the local gradients in fluid properties, which provide the driving potential for the mixing. In the rear compressor stages, due to high clearances and low aspect ratios, only accounting for the development of secondary and clearance flow structures, it is possible to properly predict the spanwise mixing. In this work, the results of steady and unsteady simulations on a heavy-duty axial compressor are compared with experimental data. Adopting an unsteady framework, the enhanced mixing in the rear stages is properly captured, in remarkable agreement with experimental distributions. On the contrary, steady analyses strongly underestimate the radial transport. It is inferred that the streamwise vorticity associated with clearance flows is a major driver of radial mixing, and restraining it by pitch-averaging the flow at mixing planes is the reason why the steady approach cannot predict the radial transport in the rear part of the compressor. | |
