YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Girder–Deck Interface: Partial Debonding, Deck Replacement, and Composite Action

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Chaohui Li; Rémy D. Lequesne; Adolfo Matamoros
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001311
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Results are reported from tests of three precast, prestressed concrete girders under fatigue-type cyclic and monotonic loading conducted after deck removal and replacement. Although deck demolition altered the top surface of the girders, the girder–deck interfaces exhibited shear strengths greater than their nominal strength (based on the 2012 AASHTO LRFD Specification) after 2 × 106 cycles of loading to 45 and 30% of their nominal strength for troweled and roughened interfaces, respectively. A partially debonded detail was used for two of the girders to protect the girder top flange, which was wide and thin, during deck demolition. The roofing felt used to debond the girder–deck interface over the flanges reduced the effort required for deck removal by 65%, compared with the typical detail, eliminated chipping hammer–induced damage to the girder flanges, and still resulted in sustained composite action under 2 × 106 cycles of loading. The width of the bonded interface had little effect on girder stiffness and no observed effect on the width of deck effective in bending.
    • Download: (3.990Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Girder–Deck Interface: Partial Debonding, Deck Replacement, and Composite Action

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255294
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChaohui Li; Rémy D. Lequesne; Adolfo Matamoros
    date accessioned2019-03-10T12:18:32Z
    date available2019-03-10T12:18:32Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001311.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255294
    description abstractResults are reported from tests of three precast, prestressed concrete girders under fatigue-type cyclic and monotonic loading conducted after deck removal and replacement. Although deck demolition altered the top surface of the girders, the girder–deck interfaces exhibited shear strengths greater than their nominal strength (based on the 2012 AASHTO LRFD Specification) after 2 × 106 cycles of loading to 45 and 30% of their nominal strength for troweled and roughened interfaces, respectively. A partially debonded detail was used for two of the girders to protect the girder top flange, which was wide and thin, during deck demolition. The roofing felt used to debond the girder–deck interface over the flanges reduced the effort required for deck removal by 65%, compared with the typical detail, eliminated chipping hammer–induced damage to the girder flanges, and still resulted in sustained composite action under 2 × 106 cycles of loading. The width of the bonded interface had little effect on girder stiffness and no observed effect on the width of deck effective in bending.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleGirder–Deck Interface: Partial Debonding, Deck Replacement, and Composite Action
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001311
    page04018099
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian