YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Critical Condition Modeling and Analysis in TMDL Development and Implementation

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Harry X. Zhang; G. Padmanabhan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001729
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The USEPA’s Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program under the Clean Water Act requires taking into account the critical conditions for stream flow, loading, and water quality parameters to develop TMDLs. However, properly defining a waterway’s critical conditions is one of the key challenges in developing a TMDL. Consequently, many current TMDLs address this aspect only in a cursory manner. This paper presents a review of critical condition modeling and analysis approaches and illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of available methodologies to define critical conditions with a view to provide guidance for TMDL development and implementation. Four major approaches for critical condition modeling and analysis are typically employed in TMDL studies: low-flow analysis using steady-state models, continuous simulation using dynamic models, statistically based load-duration curves, and the event-based critical flow-storm approach. By understanding better how to define critical conditions, water quality professionals can develop more-meaningful and improved estimates of TMDLs and formulate appropriate strategies to control pollution from point and nonpoint sources at a watershed level.
    • Download: (395.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Critical Condition Modeling and Analysis in TMDL Development and Implementation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255047
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHarry X. Zhang; G. Padmanabhan
    date accessioned2019-03-10T12:11:15Z
    date available2019-03-10T12:11:15Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001729.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255047
    description abstractThe USEPA’s Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program under the Clean Water Act requires taking into account the critical conditions for stream flow, loading, and water quality parameters to develop TMDLs. However, properly defining a waterway’s critical conditions is one of the key challenges in developing a TMDL. Consequently, many current TMDLs address this aspect only in a cursory manner. This paper presents a review of critical condition modeling and analysis approaches and illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of available methodologies to define critical conditions with a view to provide guidance for TMDL development and implementation. Four major approaches for critical condition modeling and analysis are typically employed in TMDL studies: low-flow analysis using steady-state models, continuous simulation using dynamic models, statistically based load-duration curves, and the event-based critical flow-storm approach. By understanding better how to define critical conditions, water quality professionals can develop more-meaningful and improved estimates of TMDLs and formulate appropriate strategies to control pollution from point and nonpoint sources at a watershed level.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCritical Condition Modeling and Analysis in TMDL Development and Implementation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001729
    page04018061
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian