Understanding and Interpreting Baseline Perceptions of Sustainability in Construction among Civil Engineers in the United StatesSource: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003Author:Wai Kiong Chong
,
Sanat Kumar
,
Carl T. Haas
,
Salwa M. Beheiry
,
Lonnie Coplen
,
Marvin Oey
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:3(143)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The highly influential Brundtland report released in 1987 was the first document to define the three pillars of modern sustainable development as environmental, social, and economic. The Rio Summit in 1992, the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and the Johannesburg Meeting in 2002 followed up with primary focus on the needs of society and the environment. Economic issues were secondary at these meetings. This movement was the beginning of what has been passed down to the construction industry as sustainable construction. Within the industry, however, confusion reigns, and attitudes toward sustainable construction vary wildly. Understanding perceptions of sustainability in the industry would help to navigate a path towards a common understanding of the issues, to reach a point from which a reasoned dialogue could ensue concerning the relative merits of different approaches to sustainability and to sustainable construction itself. To understand perceptions of sustainability in the construction industry, a survey of close to 200 practitioners was conducted between July and Sept. 2006. Its results are described and analyzed in this article. Some conclusions are made and recommendations are suggested based on this analysis. In particular, it is clear that a persistent and broad-based effort will be required to introduce sustainability effectively to the profession.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Wai Kiong Chong | |
contributor author | Sanat Kumar | |
contributor author | Carl T. Haas | |
contributor author | Salwa M. Beheiry | |
contributor author | Lonnie Coplen | |
contributor author | Marvin Oey | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:12:05Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:12:05Z | |
date copyright | July 2009 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290742-597x%282009%2925%3A3%28143%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42546 | |
description abstract | The highly influential Brundtland report released in 1987 was the first document to define the three pillars of modern sustainable development as environmental, social, and economic. The Rio Summit in 1992, the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and the Johannesburg Meeting in 2002 followed up with primary focus on the needs of society and the environment. Economic issues were secondary at these meetings. This movement was the beginning of what has been passed down to the construction industry as sustainable construction. Within the industry, however, confusion reigns, and attitudes toward sustainable construction vary wildly. Understanding perceptions of sustainability in the industry would help to navigate a path towards a common understanding of the issues, to reach a point from which a reasoned dialogue could ensue concerning the relative merits of different approaches to sustainability and to sustainable construction itself. To understand perceptions of sustainability in the construction industry, a survey of close to 200 practitioners was conducted between July and Sept. 2006. Its results are described and analyzed in this article. Some conclusions are made and recommendations are suggested based on this analysis. In particular, it is clear that a persistent and broad-based effort will be required to introduce sustainability effectively to the profession. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Understanding and Interpreting Baseline Perceptions of Sustainability in Construction among Civil Engineers in the United States | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 25 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:3(143) | |
tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |