Show simple item record

contributor authorClark, John P.
contributor authorBeck, Joseph A.
contributor authorKaszynski, Alex A.
contributor authorStill, Angela
contributor authorNi, Ron-Ho
date accessioned2019-02-28T11:09:27Z
date available2019-02-28T11:09:27Z
date copyright4/30/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_140_06_061007.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253279
description abstractThis effort focuses on the comparison of unsteadiness due to as-measured turbine blades in a transonic turbine to that obtained with blueprint geometries via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes flow solver with the two-equation Wilcox turbulence model is used as the numerical analysis tool for comparison between the blueprint geometries and as-manufactured geometries obtained from a structured light optical measurement system. The nominal turbine CFD grid data defined for analysis of the blueprint blade were geometrically modified to reflect as-manufactured turbine blades using an established mesh metamorphosis algorithm. The approach uses a modified neural network to iteratively update the source mesh to the target mesh. In this case, the source is the interior CFD surface grid while the target is the surface blade geometry obtained from the optical scanner. Nodes interior to the CFD surface were updated using a modified iterative spring analogy to avoid grid corruption when matching as-manufactured part geometry. This approach avoids the tedious manual approach of regenerating the CFD grid and does not rely on geometry obtained from coordinate measurement machine (CMM) sections, but rather a point cloud representing the entirety of the turbine blade. Surface pressure traces and the discrete Fourier transforms (DFT) thereof from numerical predictions of as-measured geometries are then compared both to blueprint predictions and to experimental measurements. The importance of incorporating as-measured geometries in analyses to explain deviations between numerical predictions of blueprint geometries and experimental results is readily apparent. Further analysis of every casting produced in the creation of the test turbine yields variations that one can expect in both aero-performance and unsteady loading as a consequence of manufacturing tolerances. Finally, the use of measured airfoil geometries to reduce the unsteady load on a target blade in a region of interest is successfully demonstrated.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Effect of Manufacturing Variations on Unsteady Interaction in a Transonic Turbine
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4039361
journal fristpage61007
journal lastpage061007-9
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2018:;volume 140:;issue 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record