Show simple item record

contributor authorKiss, Attila
contributor authorChurkin, Andrey
contributor authorPilkhwal, Darwan S.
contributor authorVaidya, Abhijeet M.
contributor authorAmbrosini, Walter
contributor authorPucciarelli, Andrea
contributor authorPodila, Krishna
contributor authorRao, Yanfei
contributor authorLeung, Laurence
contributor authorYuzhou, Chen
contributor authorAnderson, Mark
contributor authorZhao, Meng
date accessioned2019-02-28T11:05:29Z
date available2019-02-28T11:05:29Z
date copyright12/4/2017 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier issn2332-8983
identifier otherners_004_01_011001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252575
description abstractTwo computational fluid dynamic (CFD) benchmarks have been performed to assess the prediction accuracy and sensitivity of CFD codes for heat transfer in different geometries. The first benchmark focused on heat transfer to water in a tube (first benchmark), while the second benchmark covered heat transfer to water in two different channel geometries (second benchmark) at supercritical pressures. In the first round with the experimental data unknown to the participants (i.e., blind calculations), CFD calculations were conducted with initial boundary conditions and simpler CFD models. After assessment against measurements, the calculations were repeated with the refined boundary conditions and material properties in the follow-up calculation phase. Overall, the CFD codes seem to be able to capture the general trend of heat transfer in the tube and the annular channel but further improvements are required in order to enhance the prediction accuracy. Finally, sensitivity analyses on the numerical mesh and the boundary conditions were performed. It was found that the prediction accuracy has not been improved with the introduction of finer meshes and the effect of mass flux on the result is the strongest among various investigated boundary conditions.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleSummary on the Results of Two Computational Fluid Dynamic Benchmarks of Tube and Different Channel Geometries
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
identifier doi10.1115/1.4038162
journal fristpage11001
journal lastpage011001-15
treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2018:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record