Show simple item record

contributor authorShah, Niraj
contributor authorGavasane, Abhimanyu
contributor authorAgrawal, Amit
contributor authorBhandarkar, Upendra
date accessioned2019-02-28T11:00:01Z
date available2019-02-28T11:00:01Z
date copyright10/19/2017 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherfe_140_03_031205.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251585
description abstractThree-dimensional (3D) direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) has been used to simulate flow in a straight microchannel using an in-house parallelized code. In the present work, a comparative study of seven boundary conditions is carried out with respect to time required for achieving steady-state, accuracy in predicting the specified pressure at the boundaries, and the total simulation time required for attaining a statistical error within one percent. The effect of changing the Knudsen number, pressure ratio (PR), and cross aspect ratio (CAR) on these parameters is also studied. The presence of a boundary is seen to affect the simulated pressure in a cell when compared to the specified pressure, the difference being highest for corner cells and least for cells away from walls. All boundary conditions tested work well at the inlet boundary; however, similar results are not obtained at the outlet boundary. For the same cell size, the schemes that employ first- and second-order corrections lead to a smaller pressure difference compared to schemes applying no corrections. The best predictions can be obtained by using first-order corrections with finer cell size close to the boundary. For most of the simulated cases, the boundary condition employing the characteristic scheme with nonequilibrium effect leads to the minimum simulation time. Considering the nonequilibrium effect, prediction of inlet and outlet pressures and the speed of simulation, the characteristic scheme with nonequilibrium effect performs better than all the other schemes, at least over the range of parameters investigated herein.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Various Pressure Based Boundary Conditions for Three-Dimensional Subsonic DSMC Simulation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4037679
journal fristpage31205
journal lastpage031205-12
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record