YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Relational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual Incentives

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    M. Motiar Rahman
    ,
    Mohan M. Kumaraswamy
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:1(48)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Integration in construction projects implies alignment of both structural arrangements and operational mechanisms, in order to effectively coordinate and streamline the combined efforts of various interacting parties, for improved project outcomes. Appropriate use of relational contracting (RC) principles may help achieve such integration. As such, the aims of the reported study are to examine the relative usefulness of various potential strategies and factors, to provide suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives, for building a RC culture, and nurturing effective teamwork in construction. Results from statistical analyses of 83 questionnaire responses from Hong Kong are presented. These results attribute various degrees of importance to different factors and strategies, both for RC and teamworking. The outcomes also suggest the need for a highly interactive and consolidated approach, both for propagating RC and building integrated project teams. It is observed that trust and trust based operational and contractual arrangements can effectively provide the required incentives, for implementing various RC-based working arrangements in construction. These should extend to assessing “relational” attributes during team selection, under cliental initiative and top management support. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable RC-based working arrangements.
    • Download: (153.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Relational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual Incentives

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/42501
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Motiar Rahman
    contributor authorMohan M. Kumaraswamy
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:12:01Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:12:01Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282008%2924%3A1%2848%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42501
    description abstractIntegration in construction projects implies alignment of both structural arrangements and operational mechanisms, in order to effectively coordinate and streamline the combined efforts of various interacting parties, for improved project outcomes. Appropriate use of relational contracting (RC) principles may help achieve such integration. As such, the aims of the reported study are to examine the relative usefulness of various potential strategies and factors, to provide suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives, for building a RC culture, and nurturing effective teamwork in construction. Results from statistical analyses of 83 questionnaire responses from Hong Kong are presented. These results attribute various degrees of importance to different factors and strategies, both for RC and teamworking. The outcomes also suggest the need for a highly interactive and consolidated approach, both for propagating RC and building integrated project teams. It is observed that trust and trust based operational and contractual arrangements can effectively provide the required incentives, for implementing various RC-based working arrangements in construction. These should extend to assessing “relational” attributes during team selection, under cliental initiative and top management support. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable RC-based working arrangements.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRelational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual Incentives
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:1(48)
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian