YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Combining Hydrologic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Approaches to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Infrastructure

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Tavakol-Davani Hassan;Burian Steven J.;Butler David;Sample David;Devkota Jay;Apul Defne
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001340
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Designing urban water infrastructure systems for environmental sustainability requires consideration of hydrologic performance design criteria and results from life cycle assessment (LCA). The objective of this paper is to present a study of merging hydrologic and LCA criteria into the evaluation of the environmental sustainability of rainwater harvesting (RWH) to control combined sewer overflows (CSOs). A case study of the City of Toledo, Ohio combined sewer system serves as the platform to investigate the two approaches and to compare RWH with centralized gray infrastructure strategies for controlling CSOs. Results show that the four RWH scenarios studied (two RWH-only: one to supply toilet flushing demand and the other to serve as extended detention; and two hybrids based on combining the two previous with gray infrastructure) delivered higher combined sewage volumes to wastewater treatment facilities compared to a gray infrastructure–only scenario. This resulted in elevated life cycle global warming potential (GWP) impacts (1.1 kg CO2e per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs) on average for the four RWH scenarios. The gray infrastructure–only scenario reduced GWP impacts because it included sewer separation leading to lowered amounts of combined sewage volume treated (−1.89  kg CO2e per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs). But, due to the untreated stormwater discharges to receiving waters, the gray infrastructure–only scenario led to a higher ecotoxicity water (ETW) impact [−12.11 comparative toxic unit for ecotoxicity (CTU eco) per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs] compared to the RWH scenarios (−19.62 CTU eco per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs on average). In conclusion, the new watershed-scale LCA framework led to more information on the CSO control strategies compared to hydrologic-only analysis, but it created a more complicated decision. Information from Toledo water stakeholders must be taken into account before nominating a scenario as the one that globally outperforms the others according the multi-hydrologic-LCA criteria.
    • Download: (1.737Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Combining Hydrologic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Approaches to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Infrastructure

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249642
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTavakol-Davani Hassan;Burian Steven J.;Butler David;Sample David;Devkota Jay;Apul Defne
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:23Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:49:23Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001340.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249642
    description abstractDesigning urban water infrastructure systems for environmental sustainability requires consideration of hydrologic performance design criteria and results from life cycle assessment (LCA). The objective of this paper is to present a study of merging hydrologic and LCA criteria into the evaluation of the environmental sustainability of rainwater harvesting (RWH) to control combined sewer overflows (CSOs). A case study of the City of Toledo, Ohio combined sewer system serves as the platform to investigate the two approaches and to compare RWH with centralized gray infrastructure strategies for controlling CSOs. Results show that the four RWH scenarios studied (two RWH-only: one to supply toilet flushing demand and the other to serve as extended detention; and two hybrids based on combining the two previous with gray infrastructure) delivered higher combined sewage volumes to wastewater treatment facilities compared to a gray infrastructure–only scenario. This resulted in elevated life cycle global warming potential (GWP) impacts (1.1 kg CO2e per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs) on average for the four RWH scenarios. The gray infrastructure–only scenario reduced GWP impacts because it included sewer separation leading to lowered amounts of combined sewage volume treated (−1.89  kg CO2e per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs). But, due to the untreated stormwater discharges to receiving waters, the gray infrastructure–only scenario led to a higher ecotoxicity water (ETW) impact [−12.11 comparative toxic unit for ecotoxicity (CTU eco) per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs] compared to the RWH scenarios (−19.62 CTU eco per 1  m3 of reduced CSOs on average). In conclusion, the new watershed-scale LCA framework led to more information on the CSO control strategies compared to hydrologic-only analysis, but it created a more complicated decision. Information from Toledo water stakeholders must be taken into account before nominating a scenario as the one that globally outperforms the others according the multi-hydrologic-LCA criteria.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCombining Hydrologic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Approaches to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Infrastructure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001340
    page5018006
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian