YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experimental Comparison of Dynamic Behavior of Structures with a Particle Damper and a Tuned Mass Damper

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Lu Zheng;Huang Biao;Wang Zixin;Zhou Ying
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002213
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper investigates the dynamic behavior of structures with a particle damper (PD) and a tuned mass damper (TMD) by shaking table tests and aeroelastic wind tunnel tests. The influence of parameters including seismic waves, peak ground accelerations, damping ratios, mass ratios, and wind angles of attack are analyzed. A systematic comparison between the PD and TMD shows that the vibration-control effects of the PD are generally better than those of the TMD under both earthquake and wind loads. The reason lies in the fact that the PD can dissipate the input energy not only by tuning frequency (similar to TMD) but also by the impact and friction between particles and between the particles and the wall of the container. Moreover, a theoretical analysis of a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system with optimum PD and TMD was also carried out by numerical simulations, and the hidden vibration-control mechanism is discussed. The results indicate that the optimum vibration-control effects of both dampers are comparable, but the swing amplitude of the additional mass of the PD is much smaller than that of the TMD. Through a series of experiments with various parameters, the results demonstrate that the characteristics of the seismic input and the wind angle of attack have a larger influence on the damping performance of the TMD compared with the PD, indicating that the PD is less sensitive to the changing parameters.
    • Download: (2.245Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experimental Comparison of Dynamic Behavior of Structures with a Particle Damper and a Tuned Mass Damper

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249471
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLu Zheng;Huang Biao;Wang Zixin;Zhou Ying
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:47:54Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:47:54Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002213.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249471
    description abstractThis paper investigates the dynamic behavior of structures with a particle damper (PD) and a tuned mass damper (TMD) by shaking table tests and aeroelastic wind tunnel tests. The influence of parameters including seismic waves, peak ground accelerations, damping ratios, mass ratios, and wind angles of attack are analyzed. A systematic comparison between the PD and TMD shows that the vibration-control effects of the PD are generally better than those of the TMD under both earthquake and wind loads. The reason lies in the fact that the PD can dissipate the input energy not only by tuning frequency (similar to TMD) but also by the impact and friction between particles and between the particles and the wall of the container. Moreover, a theoretical analysis of a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system with optimum PD and TMD was also carried out by numerical simulations, and the hidden vibration-control mechanism is discussed. The results indicate that the optimum vibration-control effects of both dampers are comparable, but the swing amplitude of the additional mass of the PD is much smaller than that of the TMD. Through a series of experiments with various parameters, the results demonstrate that the characteristics of the seismic input and the wind angle of attack have a larger influence on the damping performance of the TMD compared with the PD, indicating that the PD is less sensitive to the changing parameters.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleExperimental Comparison of Dynamic Behavior of Structures with a Particle Damper and a Tuned Mass Damper
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002213
    page4018211
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian