YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Laboratory Testing of Strengthened Cavity Unreinforced Masonry Walls

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Derakhshan Hossein;Lucas Wade;Visintin Phillip;Griffith Michael C.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001987
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An experimental campaign consisting of nine pressure-controlled quasi-static airbag tests on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and accompanying material testing was completed to investigate methods for seismic retrofit of out-of-plane loaded cavity walls. Three control walls were tested to serve as a baseline for wall strength comparisons: (1) a double-leaf unstrengthened cavity wall; (2) a cavity wall with improved cavity connections; and (3) a single-leaf wall strengthened using a near-surface-mounted (NSM) fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strip. The experimental program was concluded by six tests that were conducted on walls strengthened using a NSM FRP strip and having cavity connections in the form of either standard bent metal ties, proprietary helical anchors, or industrial foam. The tests were designed to measure the ability of the different cavity connections to maintain the cavity gap until a ductile wall failure mechanism forms by FRP debonding. Three of the walls were previously damaged by testing in either unstrengthened or FRP-strengthened conditions. These tests were intended to study FRP retrofit effectiveness of precracked walls or the relative ability of different types of cavity connections to resist forces until a global FRP debonding occurs. For each of the six cavity connection configurations, the FRP-strengthening technique was shown to significantly improve the wall strength. The minimum strength increase was 282% compared with that of the control cavity wall. The compiled data are presented followed by general discussions on the design of seismic retrofit for cavity walls.
    • Download: (1.175Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Laboratory Testing of Strengthened Cavity Unreinforced Masonry Walls

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248853
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDerakhshan Hossein;Lucas Wade;Visintin Phillip;Griffith Michael C.
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:42:33Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:42:33Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001987.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248853
    description abstractAn experimental campaign consisting of nine pressure-controlled quasi-static airbag tests on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and accompanying material testing was completed to investigate methods for seismic retrofit of out-of-plane loaded cavity walls. Three control walls were tested to serve as a baseline for wall strength comparisons: (1) a double-leaf unstrengthened cavity wall; (2) a cavity wall with improved cavity connections; and (3) a single-leaf wall strengthened using a near-surface-mounted (NSM) fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strip. The experimental program was concluded by six tests that were conducted on walls strengthened using a NSM FRP strip and having cavity connections in the form of either standard bent metal ties, proprietary helical anchors, or industrial foam. The tests were designed to measure the ability of the different cavity connections to maintain the cavity gap until a ductile wall failure mechanism forms by FRP debonding. Three of the walls were previously damaged by testing in either unstrengthened or FRP-strengthened conditions. These tests were intended to study FRP retrofit effectiveness of precracked walls or the relative ability of different types of cavity connections to resist forces until a global FRP debonding occurs. For each of the six cavity connection configurations, the FRP-strengthening technique was shown to significantly improve the wall strength. The minimum strength increase was 282% compared with that of the control cavity wall. The compiled data are presented followed by general discussions on the design of seismic retrofit for cavity walls.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLaboratory Testing of Strengthened Cavity Unreinforced Masonry Walls
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001987
    page4018005
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian