YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multistakeholder Conflict Minimization–Based Layout Planning of Construction Temporary Facilities

    Source: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Song Xiaoling;Zhong Lin;Zhang Zhe;Xu Jiuping;Shen Charles;Peña-Mora Feniosky
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000725
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The layout planning of construction temporary facilities (CTFs) is a specific construction site layout problem. Despite considerable research undertaken to determine satisfactory layouts of CTFs for their significance on a successful completion, conflicts between the facility layout (layout planner) and other preplanning tasks (involved stakeholders) are neglected during the best layout design process. Such conflicts are widely recognized to cause economic losses, delay projects, damage the environment, and worsen the construction quality. This study establishes a multistakeholder conflict minimization–based framework to consider conflict mitigation in the evaluation and selection processes of planning a facility layout. Simultaneously, satisfactory solutions for the involved stakeholders are selected to achieve a cost-duration-quality-environment trade-off for overall project success. Specifically, key stakeholders and the respective decision options are identified by using existing mathematical techniques in Module I and subsequently constructing a “solution pool” in Module II. In Module III, the facility layout planner analyzes the conflict structure to roughly estimate the ranking criteria values with regard to each solution, which are input into the first filtering processor to eliminate infeasible solutions in Module IV, and, accordingly, the parent solutions are shortlisted. In Module V, a moderate group is selected and a multicriteria double-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making method is proposed to minimize the multistakeholder conflicts as well as to select the best facility layout. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, a case study is conducted on a large-scale dam construction project. The system is validated to be useful for both academic researchers and practitioners to deal with the best solution (i.e., the layout of CTFs, the plan of transport routes) selection from a global viewpoint.
    • Download: (2.011Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multistakeholder Conflict Minimization–Based Layout Planning of Construction Temporary Facilities

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248612
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSong Xiaoling;Zhong Lin;Zhang Zhe;Xu Jiuping;Shen Charles;Peña-Mora Feniosky
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:40:11Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:40:11Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CP.1943-5487.0000725.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248612
    description abstractThe layout planning of construction temporary facilities (CTFs) is a specific construction site layout problem. Despite considerable research undertaken to determine satisfactory layouts of CTFs for their significance on a successful completion, conflicts between the facility layout (layout planner) and other preplanning tasks (involved stakeholders) are neglected during the best layout design process. Such conflicts are widely recognized to cause economic losses, delay projects, damage the environment, and worsen the construction quality. This study establishes a multistakeholder conflict minimization–based framework to consider conflict mitigation in the evaluation and selection processes of planning a facility layout. Simultaneously, satisfactory solutions for the involved stakeholders are selected to achieve a cost-duration-quality-environment trade-off for overall project success. Specifically, key stakeholders and the respective decision options are identified by using existing mathematical techniques in Module I and subsequently constructing a “solution pool” in Module II. In Module III, the facility layout planner analyzes the conflict structure to roughly estimate the ranking criteria values with regard to each solution, which are input into the first filtering processor to eliminate infeasible solutions in Module IV, and, accordingly, the parent solutions are shortlisted. In Module V, a moderate group is selected and a multicriteria double-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making method is proposed to minimize the multistakeholder conflicts as well as to select the best facility layout. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, a case study is conducted on a large-scale dam construction project. The system is validated to be useful for both academic researchers and practitioners to deal with the best solution (i.e., the layout of CTFs, the plan of transport routes) selection from a global viewpoint.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleMultistakeholder Conflict Minimization–Based Layout Planning of Construction Temporary Facilities
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000725
    page4017080
    treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian