YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Fatigue Crack Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Systems in Fracture Critical Inspection of Steel Bridges

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Dorafshan Sattar;Thomas Robert J.;Maguire Marc
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001291
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Many state agencies are investigating the use of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) for bridge inspections. Some agencies are receiving pressure from consultants and their own administrations to implement UAS inspections with limited knowledge of their efficacy. This paper studies the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in bridges with fracture critical members (FCMs) through real-time and postflight visual inspection. The effects of surface illumination on the maximum crack-to-camera (MCC) distance at which a fatigue crack can be detected were investigated in the laboratory. Mock field inspections evaluated the achievable crack-to-platform (ACP) distance in Global Positioning System (GPS)-denied and windy environments to determine whether known cracks can be identified at achievable standoff distances. Finally, two FCM inspections demonstrated the field performance of UASs in identifying fatigue cracks. Results highlight the importance of camera specifications and surface illumination in determining the required standoff distance of crack detection. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the difficulties in obtaining clear images with unstable UASs in GPS-denied or windy environments. Nevertheless, the best performing platform tested in this study exhibited a performance comparable to an average of 3 human inspectors at a fatigue crack identification training structure. The limited results presented here proved the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in FCM inspections of steel bridges and highlighted the shortcomings of UASs for this type of hands-on inspection.
    • Download: (3.514Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Fatigue Crack Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Systems in Fracture Critical Inspection of Steel Bridges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248438
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDorafshan Sattar;Thomas Robert J.;Maguire Marc
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:38:25Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:38:25Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001291.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248438
    description abstractMany state agencies are investigating the use of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) for bridge inspections. Some agencies are receiving pressure from consultants and their own administrations to implement UAS inspections with limited knowledge of their efficacy. This paper studies the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in bridges with fracture critical members (FCMs) through real-time and postflight visual inspection. The effects of surface illumination on the maximum crack-to-camera (MCC) distance at which a fatigue crack can be detected were investigated in the laboratory. Mock field inspections evaluated the achievable crack-to-platform (ACP) distance in Global Positioning System (GPS)-denied and windy environments to determine whether known cracks can be identified at achievable standoff distances. Finally, two FCM inspections demonstrated the field performance of UASs in identifying fatigue cracks. Results highlight the importance of camera specifications and surface illumination in determining the required standoff distance of crack detection. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the difficulties in obtaining clear images with unstable UASs in GPS-denied or windy environments. Nevertheless, the best performing platform tested in this study exhibited a performance comparable to an average of 3 human inspectors at a fatigue crack identification training structure. The limited results presented here proved the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in FCM inspections of steel bridges and highlighted the shortcomings of UASs for this type of hands-on inspection.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFatigue Crack Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Systems in Fracture Critical Inspection of Steel Bridges
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001291
    page4018078
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian