YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Water Resources Criticality Due to Future Climate Change and Population Growth: Case of River Basins in Utah, USA

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Khatri Krishna B.;Strong Courtenay;Kochanski Adam K.;Burian Steven;Miller Craig;Hasenyager Candice
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000959
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This study investigates annual river basin–level water criticality (ratio of available water to withdrawals) considering effects of climate change on supply and of future population change on demand. A steady-state water balance model was developed to estimate the water mass budget and disaggregate the internal and external water supply sources at a river basin level. Future precipitation and evapotranspiration were dynamically downscaled under a moderate greenhouse gas emission scenario to 4-km horizontal resolution using a regional climate model for a decade centered on 29. The climate data were also statistically downscaled via the bias correction spatial disaggregation (BCSD) method applied to the CMIP5 (the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) archives for four emission scenarios for decades centered on 24 and 29. Bootstrapping and k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) algorithms were applied to simulate future water demand and external basin supply with uncertainty. Water stress is classified into four levels: (i) “very high-water stress” when the water criticality ratio <1.25, (ii) “high water stress” when criticality ranges from 1.25 to 2.5, (iii) “moderate water stress” when criticality ranges from 2.5 to 1, and (iii) “no water stress” when criticality >1. A basin with a criticality ratio of 1 indicates that the basin demand has been exactly met by the available supply sources. Most river basins have current water criticality less than 2 and are dependent on inflow from other basins (i.e., are not self sustaining). Future projections indicate modest increases in net available water for Utah through the end of the current century from climate change, with increasing vulnerability largely driven by population growth. Out of 11 basins, 4 achieve a high and 3 achieve a very high water stress status by the 24s. Four basins achieve a very high water stress status by the 29s compared to only two in a very high water stress status in the 21s.
    • Download: (1.661Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Water Resources Criticality Due to Future Climate Change and Population Growth: Case of River Basins in Utah, USA

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248150
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKhatri Krishna B.;Strong Courtenay;Kochanski Adam K.;Burian Steven;Miller Craig;Hasenyager Candice
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:35:51Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:35:51Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000959.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248150
    description abstractThis study investigates annual river basin–level water criticality (ratio of available water to withdrawals) considering effects of climate change on supply and of future population change on demand. A steady-state water balance model was developed to estimate the water mass budget and disaggregate the internal and external water supply sources at a river basin level. Future precipitation and evapotranspiration were dynamically downscaled under a moderate greenhouse gas emission scenario to 4-km horizontal resolution using a regional climate model for a decade centered on 29. The climate data were also statistically downscaled via the bias correction spatial disaggregation (BCSD) method applied to the CMIP5 (the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) archives for four emission scenarios for decades centered on 24 and 29. Bootstrapping and k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) algorithms were applied to simulate future water demand and external basin supply with uncertainty. Water stress is classified into four levels: (i) “very high-water stress” when the water criticality ratio <1.25, (ii) “high water stress” when criticality ranges from 1.25 to 2.5, (iii) “moderate water stress” when criticality ranges from 2.5 to 1, and (iii) “no water stress” when criticality >1. A basin with a criticality ratio of 1 indicates that the basin demand has been exactly met by the available supply sources. Most river basins have current water criticality less than 2 and are dependent on inflow from other basins (i.e., are not self sustaining). Future projections indicate modest increases in net available water for Utah through the end of the current century from climate change, with increasing vulnerability largely driven by population growth. Out of 11 basins, 4 achieve a high and 3 achieve a very high water stress status by the 24s. Four basins achieve a very high water stress status by the 29s compared to only two in a very high water stress status in the 21s.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleWater Resources Criticality Due to Future Climate Change and Population Growth: Case of River Basins in Utah, USA
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000959
    page4018041
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian